FPAG vs. FMIJX
FPAG (FPA Global Equity ETF) and FMIJX (FMI International Fund) are both funds - FPAG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by FPA, while FMIJX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by FMI Funds. Over the past 3 years, FPAG returned 21.48%/yr vs 7.53%/yr for FMIJX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FPAG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for FMIJX.
Performance
FPAG vs. FMIJX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPAG achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly higher than FMIJX's 0.40% return.
FPAG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 6M
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- 21.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMIJX
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 5.23%
- 3Y*
- 7.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 5.40%
FPAG vs. FMIJX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPAG FPA Global Equity ETF | 8.22% | 25.17% | 15.64% | 29.55% | -17.87% | 2.93% |
FMIJX FMI International Fund | 0.40% | 8.57% | 6.99% | 21.81% | -18.67% | 3.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPAG and FMIJX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FPAG and FMIJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPAG vs. FMIJX — Risk / Return Rank
FPAG
FMIJX
FPAG vs. FMIJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) and FMI International Fund (FMIJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPAG | FMIJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 0.36 | +1.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 0.63 | +2.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.07 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 0.37 | +1.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.45 | 1.25 | +7.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPAG | FMIJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.36 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.48 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
FPAG vs. FMIJX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPAG drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, smaller than the maximum FMIJX drawdown of -37.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPAG and FMIJX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPAG | FMIJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.43% | -37.45% | +9.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -13.46% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | -15.88% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.84% | +5.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.37% | -4.67% | -1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 4.01% | -0.81% |
Volatility
FPAG vs. FMIJX - Volatility Comparison
FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to FMI International Fund (FMIJX) at 3.95%. This indicates that FPAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMIJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPAG | FMIJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 3.95% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.37% | 11.01% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.63% | 14.08% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 14.37% | +5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 15.18% | +4.22% |
FPAG vs. FMIJX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPAG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FMIJX's 0.94% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPAG vs. FMIJX - Dividend Comparison
FPAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than FMIJX's 13.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMIJX FMI International Fund | 13.04% | 13.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 3.55% | 7.43% | 0.28% | 3.76% | 1.84% |
FPAG FPA Global Equity ETF | 1.40% | 1.99% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPAG and FMIJX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPAG has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to FMIJX (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPAG dropped -28.43% vs FMIJX's -37.45%.
FPAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPAG and FMIJX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer