PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCEQX vs. CWGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UCEQX vs. CWGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) and American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCEQX achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly lower than CWGIX's 15.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UCEQX having a 11.63% annualized return and CWGIX not far ahead at 12.07%.


UCEQX

1D
0.56%
1M
5.39%
YTD
14.21%
6M
15.38%
1Y
31.84%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
11.63%

CWGIX

1D
0.23%
1M
6.04%
YTD
15.66%
6M
18.02%
1Y
33.56%
3Y*
21.95%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*
12.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCEQX vs. CWGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
14.21%23.71%14.50%19.36%-16.25%19.68%10.76%22.49%-12.06%22.59%
CWGIX
American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A
15.66%24.68%13.85%20.55%-17.32%14.74%15.31%25.32%-10.60%24.55%

Correlation

The correlation between UCEQX and CWGIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2012

0.96

The correlation between UCEQX and CWGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UCEQX vs. CWGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCEQX
UCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
UCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

CWGIX
CWGIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CWGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CWGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCEQX vs. CWGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) and American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UCEQXCWGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.68

2.57

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.68

3.54

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.47

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

3.28

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.44

14.44

+2.00

UCEQX vs. CWGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCEQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the CWGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCEQX and CWGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UCEQXCWGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

2.57

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.74

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.76

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.69

+0.01

Drawdowns

UCEQX vs. CWGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCEQX drawdown since its inception was -35.33%, smaller than the maximum CWGIX drawdown of -54.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCEQX and CWGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UCEQXCWGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.33%

-54.47%

+19.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-10.52%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.64%

-15.56%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

-27.18%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.33%

-32.00%

-3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-7.13%

+2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.39%

-0.40%

Volatility

UCEQX vs. CWGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) is 3.67%, while American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that UCEQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UCEQXCWGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

4.40%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.71%

11.08%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

13.53%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

15.20%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

16.05%

+0.45%

UCEQX vs. CWGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCEQX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CWGIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

UCEQX vs. CWGIX - Dividend Comparison

UCEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than CWGIX's 9.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWGIX
American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A
9.14%10.54%7.88%3.20%2.09%6.82%1.23%2.44%7.00%6.63%4.96%3.78%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
4.45%5.08%2.56%5.10%6.80%4.61%8.25%4.79%6.73%1.91%3.16%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, UCEQX and CWGIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CWGIX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to UCEQX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCEQX dropped -35.33% vs CWGIX's -54.47%.

UCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UCEQX and CWGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer