PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PORTX vs. TSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PORTX vs. TSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) and Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund (TSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PORTX achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly higher than TSMDX's 5.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PORTX has outperformed TSMDX with an annualized return of 9.39%, while TSMDX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.59% annualized return.


PORTX

1D
-0.83%
1M
3.65%
YTD
6.83%
6M
-7.30%
1Y
0.63%
3Y*
7.60%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
9.39%

TSMDX

1D
-0.46%
1M
1.35%
YTD
5.88%
6M
6.59%
1Y
15.03%
3Y*
9.20%
5Y*
3.26%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PORTX vs. TSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PORTX
Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund
6.83%1.15%7.67%19.02%-24.04%22.16%24.56%28.20%-7.24%27.89%
TSMDX
Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund
5.88%7.85%7.73%9.42%-17.85%23.18%15.93%25.84%-13.14%18.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PORTX and TSMDX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2015

0.83

The correlation between PORTX and TSMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PORTX vs. TSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PORTX
PORTX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PORTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PORTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PORTX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PORTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PORTX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMDX
TSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PORTX vs. TSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) and Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund (TSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PORTXTSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.23

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

1.64

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.18

5.97

-5.79

PORTX vs. TSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PORTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the TSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PORTX and TSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PORTXTSMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

1.28

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.18

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.43

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.40

-0.06

Drawdowns

PORTX vs. TSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PORTX drawdown since its inception was -51.71%, which is greater than TSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PORTX and TSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PORTXTSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.71%

-40.15%

-11.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.78%

-11.65%

-9.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

-23.21%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.32%

-27.54%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

-40.15%

+8.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.09%

-0.46%

-7.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.73%

-7.64%

-4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.37%

3.76%

+4.61%

Volatility

PORTX vs. TSMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) is 3.21%, while Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund (TSMDX) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that PORTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PORTXTSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

4.39%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.55%

11.18%

+7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

14.92%

+5.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.17%

19.50%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

20.65%

-2.45%

PORTX vs. TSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PORTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMDX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

PORTX vs. TSMDX - Dividend Comparison

Neither PORTX nor TSMDX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PORTX
Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%12.61%5.84%3.55%2.61%1.85%2.32%4.50%2.46%4.66%5.86%
TSMDX
Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%6.29%2.47%2.80%2.24%0.12%4.62%5.09%1.72%1.57%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PORTX and TSMDX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMDX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to PORTX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PORTX dropped -51.71% vs TSMDX's -40.15%.

TSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PORTX and TSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer