PORTX vs. GQRPX
PORTX (Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund) and GQRPX (GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PORTX returned 2.38%/yr vs 8.79%/yr for GQRPX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PORTX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for GQRPX.
Performance
PORTX vs. GQRPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PORTX having a 5.75% return and GQRPX slightly lower at 5.53%.
PORTX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- 1Y
- -0.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
GQRPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- 1Y
- 6.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- —
PORTX vs. GQRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund | 5.75% | 1.15% | 7.67% | 19.02% | -24.04% | 22.16% | 24.56% | 14.88% |
GQRPX GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund | 5.53% | 0.67% | 19.98% | 19.56% | -3.77% | 16.94% | 14.55% | 12.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between PORTX and GQRPX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2019 | 0.70 |
The correlation between PORTX and GQRPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PORTX vs. GQRPX — Risk / Return Rank
PORTX
GQRPX
PORTX vs. GQRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PORTX | GQRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.10 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 0.73 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 1.80 | -1.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PORTX vs. GQRPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PORTX drawdown since its inception was -51.71%, which is greater than GQRPX's maximum drawdown of -28.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PORTX and GQRPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PORTX | GQRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.71% | -28.88% | -22.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.78% | -7.02% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.56% | -16.49% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.32% | -20.39% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.02% | -5.37% | -3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.72% | -4.96% | -6.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.43% | 2.85% | +5.58% |
Volatility
PORTX vs. GQRPX - Volatility Comparison
Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX) at 3.45%. This indicates that PORTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PORTX | GQRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 3.45% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.81% | 7.33% | +11.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.74% | 9.41% | +11.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 14.73% | +4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 17.23% | +0.90% |
PORTX vs. GQRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PORTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GQRPX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
PORTX vs. GQRPX - Dividend Comparison
PORTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GQRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQRPX GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund | 7.20% | 7.60% | 6.35% | 1.22% | 2.93% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.61% | 5.84% | 3.55% | 2.61% | 1.85% | 2.32% | 4.50% | 2.46% | 4.66% | 5.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PORTX and GQRPX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PORTX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to GQRPX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PORTX dropped -51.71% vs GQRPX's -28.88%.
GQRPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PORTX and GQRPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer