PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POGAX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POGAX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund (POGAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POGAX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, POGAX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 17.12%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.33% annualized return.


POGAX

1D
0.91%
1M
-3.10%
6M
1.11%
YTD
0.25%
1Y
8.06%
3Y*
18.07%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
17.12%
ALL TIME*
9.61%

SCHG

1D
2.02%
1M
2.17%
6M
8.95%
YTD
7.11%
1Y
18.50%
3Y*
23.37%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
18.33%
ALL TIME*
16.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$249.58M$250.01M$339.80M

POGAX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POGAX
Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund
0.25%14.28%33.22%44.22%-30.43%22.64%38.44%36.44%2.29%30.97%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
7.11%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between POGAX and SCHG is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.98

The correlation between POGAX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POGAX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

POGAX
POGAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
POGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
POGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
POGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
POGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

POGAX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund (POGAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


POGAXSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.20

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

1.13

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.07

3.58

-2.51

POGAX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POGAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POGAX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

POGAX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POGAX drawdown since its inception was -76.55%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POGAX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POGAXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.55%

-34.59%

-41.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.42%

-16.41%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.66%

-23.39%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.15%

-34.59%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.15%

-34.59%

+0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.58%

-1.15%

-7.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.91%

-5.19%

-23.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

5.19%

+0.31%

Volatility

POGAX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund (POGAX) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.76%. This indicates that POGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POGAXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

4.76%

+1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.46%

13.02%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.05%

16.66%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

22.45%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.32%

21.60%

-0.28%

POGAX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

POGAX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

POGAX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

POGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POGAX
Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund
5.67%5.68%4.58%0.49%7.80%9.08%3.29%3.83%7.98%1.89%0.01%5.70%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, POGAX and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

POGAX has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to SCHG (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POGAX dropped -76.55% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POGAX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer