PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POGAX vs. MEGBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POGAX vs. MEGBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund (POGAX) and MFS Growth Fund (MEGBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POGAX achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly higher than MEGBX's 4.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with POGAX having a 18.37% annualized return and MEGBX not far behind at 17.53%.


POGAX

1D
1.57%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
6.16%
6M
5.64%
1Y
22.10%
3Y*
21.69%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
18.37%

MEGBX

1D
1.64%
1M
1.27%
YTD
4.75%
6M
4.53%
1Y
15.08%
3Y*
27.58%
5Y*
14.12%
10Y*
17.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POGAX vs. MEGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POGAX
Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund
6.16%14.28%33.22%44.22%-30.43%22.64%38.44%36.44%2.29%30.97%
MEGBX
MFS Growth Fund
4.75%11.25%61.25%34.81%-31.83%22.34%30.36%36.33%1.21%29.54%

Correlation

The correlation between POGAX and MEGBX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1996

0.94

The correlation between POGAX and MEGBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POGAX vs. MEGBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POGAX
POGAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
POGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
POGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
POGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
POGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

MEGBX
MEGBX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MEGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MEGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POGAX vs. MEGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund (POGAX) and MFS Growth Fund (MEGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


POGAXMEGBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.16

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

0.82

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.31

2.61

+1.70

POGAX vs. MEGBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the MEGBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POGAX and MEGBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

POGAX vs. MEGBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POGAX drawdown since its inception was -76.55%, roughly equal to the maximum MEGBX drawdown of -72.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POGAX and MEGBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POGAXMEGBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.55%

-72.95%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.42%

-17.64%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.66%

-23.39%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.15%

-36.73%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.15%

-36.73%

+2.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.19%

-1.37%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.99%

-21.73%

-7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.00%

5.54%

-0.54%

Volatility

POGAX vs. MEGBX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund (POGAX) and MFS Growth Fund (MEGBX) have volatilities of 6.30% and 6.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POGAXMEGBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

6.45%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

13.44%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.76%

16.74%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.78%

23.61%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.27%

22.10%

-0.83%

POGAX vs. MEGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

POGAX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MEGBX's 1.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

POGAX vs. MEGBX - Dividend Comparison

POGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, less than MEGBX's 25.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEGBX
MFS Growth Fund
25.39%26.60%40.46%7.21%1.51%3.91%4.94%2.13%4.95%3.26%2.03%4.61%
POGAX
Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund
5.35%5.68%4.58%0.49%7.80%9.08%3.29%3.83%7.98%1.89%0.01%5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, POGAX and MEGBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MEGBX has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to POGAX (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POGAX dropped -76.55% vs MEGBX's -72.95%.

POGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POGAX and MEGBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer