POGAX vs. MEGBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund (POGAX) and MFS Growth Fund (MEGBX).
POGAX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Oct 2, 1995. MEGBX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Dec 29, 1986.
Performance
POGAX vs. MEGBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
POGAX vs. MEGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POGAX Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund | -9.72% | 14.28% | 33.22% | 44.22% | -30.43% | 22.64% | 38.44% | 36.44% | 2.29% | 30.97% |
MEGBX MFS Growth Fund | -10.54% | 11.25% | 61.25% | 34.81% | -31.83% | 22.34% | 30.36% | 36.33% | 1.21% | 29.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POGAX achieves a -9.72% return, which is significantly higher than MEGBX's -10.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with POGAX having a 16.52% annualized return and MEGBX not far behind at 15.70%.
POGAX
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -9.72%
- 6M
- -9.55%
- 1Y
- 14.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 16.52%
MEGBX
- 1D
- 3.82%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- -10.54%
- 6M
- -11.39%
- 1Y
- 8.54%
- 3Y*
- 25.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
POGAX vs. MEGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
POGAX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MEGBX's 1.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
POGAX vs. MEGBX — Risk / Return Rank
POGAX
MEGBX
POGAX vs. MEGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund (POGAX) and MFS Growth Fund (MEGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POGAX | MEGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 0.44 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 0.78 | +0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.11 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 0.54 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.26 | 1.81 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POGAX | MEGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 0.44 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.52 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.72 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.49 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between POGAX and MEGBX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
POGAX vs. MEGBX - Dividend Comparison
POGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, less than MEGBX's 29.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POGAX Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund | 6.30% | 5.68% | 4.58% | 0.49% | 7.80% | 9.08% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 7.98% | 1.89% | 0.01% | 5.70% |
MEGBX MFS Growth Fund | 29.73% | 26.60% | 40.46% | 7.21% | 1.51% | 3.91% | 4.94% | 2.13% | 4.95% | 3.26% | 2.03% | 4.61% |
Drawdowns
POGAX vs. MEGBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POGAX drawdown since its inception was -76.55%, roughly equal to the maximum MEGBX drawdown of -72.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POGAX and MEGBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| POGAX | MEGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.55% | -72.95% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.42% | -17.64% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.15% | -36.73% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.15% | -36.73% | +2.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.33% | -14.49% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.18% | -21.83% | -7.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.81% | 5.27% | -0.46% |
Volatility
POGAX vs. MEGBX - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund (POGAX) and MFS Growth Fund (MEGBX) have volatilities of 6.88% and 6.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| POGAX | MEGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | 6.98% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.74% | 12.65% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 21.85% | +0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 23.52% | -1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 21.99% | -0.84% |