PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POCT vs. QFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

POCT vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

POCT vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
-1.84%11.00%8.01%
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
-2.86%17.27%16.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POCT achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly higher than QFLR's -2.86% return.


POCT

1D
1.72%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
-1.84%
6M
0.02%
1Y
10.97%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*

QFLR

1D
2.40%
1M
-3.49%
YTD
-2.86%
6M
0.45%
1Y
23.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


POCT vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

POCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

POCT vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

QFLR
QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POCT vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POCTQFLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

1.90

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

2.61

-1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

3.03

-1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.51

13.18

-4.68

POCT vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POCT and QFLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POCTQFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.90

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

1.09

-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between POCT and QFLR is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

POCT vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither POCT nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
0.00%0.02%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

POCT vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POCT drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, which is greater than QFLR's maximum drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCT and QFLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


POCTQFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-13.97%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-7.61%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-5.40%

+2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-2.61%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

1.75%

-0.42%

Volatility

POCT vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) is 3.28%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that POCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


POCTQFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

4.93%

-1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.13%

9.48%

-4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

12.31%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.90%

12.90%

-5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.31%

12.90%

-2.59%