PNQI vs. SPHQ
PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PNQI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Internet Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PNQI returned 11.73%/yr vs 15.88%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PNQI charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -18.59% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 18.67% return. Over the past 10 years, PNQI has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 11.73%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.88% annualized return.
PNQI
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -8.54%
- YTD
- -18.59%
- 6M
- -19.34%
- 1Y
- -13.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- -3.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 18.67%
- 6M
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 23.22%
- 5Y*
- 14.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.88%
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | -18.59% | 15.56% | 29.44% | 60.69% | -47.92% | -5.57% | 61.36% | 28.76% | -5.08% | 40.05% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 18.67% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNQI and SPHQ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2008 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PNQI and SPHQ has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PNQI
SPHQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PNQI
SPHQ
Communication Services
PNQI
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
PNQI
SPHQ
Financial Services
PNQI
SPHQ
Real Estate
PNQI
SPHQ
-
Industrials
PNQI
SPHQ
Healthcare
PNQI
SPHQ
Basic Materials
PNQI
-
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
PNQI
-
SPHQ
Energy
PNQI
-
SPHQ
Utilities
PNQI
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNQI vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PNQI
SPHQ
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PNQI | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.37 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 3.17 | -3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 13.51 | -14.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, roughly equal to the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNQI | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -57.83% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.85% | -8.90% | -15.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | -16.57% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.56% | -25.04% | -34.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.70% | -31.60% | -28.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.06% | -1.15% | -21.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.98% | -10.67% | -2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.55% | 2.08% | +9.47% |
Volatility
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 5.93%. This indicates that PNQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNQI | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 5.93% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.12% | 11.40% | +3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.83% | 13.48% | +5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.93% | 16.60% | +10.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 17.91% | +7.41% |
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
PNQI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.05% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PNQI and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNQI has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to SPHQ (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNQI dropped -59.70% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.88% vs 11.73% for PNQI. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.88% return vs 11.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PNQI.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for PNQI.
PNQI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PNQI tracks NASDAQ Internet Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PNQI and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer