PNQI vs. SPHQ
PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PNQI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Internet Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PNQI returned 11.84%/yr vs 14.56%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PNQI charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -8.93% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 14.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PNQI has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 11.84%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.56% annualized return.
PNQI
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- 6M
- -6.83%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 1Y
- -5.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
SPHQ
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 1Y
- 22.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- 14.56%
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | -8.93% | 15.56% | 29.44% | 60.69% | -47.92% | -5.57% | 61.36% | 28.76% | -5.08% | 40.05% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 14.73% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNQI and SPHQ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2008 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PNQI and SPHQ has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PNQI
SPHQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PNQI
SPHQ
Communication Services
PNQI
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
PNQI
SPHQ
Financial Services
PNQI
SPHQ
Real Estate
PNQI
SPHQ
-
Healthcare
PNQI
SPHQ
Industrials
PNQI
SPHQ
Basic Materials
PNQI
-
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
PNQI
-
SPHQ
Energy
PNQI
-
SPHQ
Utilities
PNQI
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNQI vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PNQI
SPHQ
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PNQI | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.27 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 2.48 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 10.05 | -10.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, roughly equal to the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNQI | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -57.83% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.85% | -8.90% | -15.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | -16.57% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.56% | -25.04% | -34.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.70% | -31.60% | -28.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.93% | -5.02% | -8.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.99% | -10.65% | -2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.22% | 2.19% | +10.03% |
Volatility
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 6.27%. This indicates that PNQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNQI | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 6.27% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.96% | 12.17% | +3.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 14.22% | +5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.00% | 16.72% | +10.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 17.94% | +7.38% |
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PNQI vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
PNQI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.09% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PNQI and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNQI has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to SPHQ (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNQI dropped -59.70% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.56% vs 11.84% for PNQI. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.56% return vs 11.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PNQI.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.00% for PNQI.
PNQI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PNQI tracks NASDAQ Internet Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PNQI and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer