PNQI vs. RFDA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. PNQI is passively managed, while RFDA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PNQI returned 0.11%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for RFDA. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PNQI charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.

Performance

PNQI vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -11.20% return, which is significantly lower than RFDA's 11.40% return.

PNQI

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: -2.33%
• YTD: -11.20%
• 6M: -11.73%
• 1Y: -2.63%
• 3Y*: 16.60%
• 5Y*: 0.11%
• 10Y*: 11.84%

RFDA

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 11.40%
• 6M: 12.25%
• 1Y: 29.49%
• 3Y*: 19.19%
• 5Y*: 13.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNQI vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF	-11.20%	15.56%	29.44%	60.69%	-47.92%	-5.57%	61.36%	28.76%	-5.08%	40.05%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	11.40%	16.42%	20.12%	16.98%	-8.58%	25.94%	11.26%	27.15%	-9.27%	19.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PNQI and RFDA is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2016	0.68

The correlation between PNQI and RFDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.70 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PNQI vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PNQI	RFDA
Technology	38.5%	19.9%
Communication Services	30.8%	8.8%
Consumer Cyclical	27.7%	7.0%
Financial Services	2.6%	14.7%
Real Estate	0.4%	5.0%
Industrials	0.1%	8.9%
Healthcare	0.0%	8.8%
Basic Materials	-	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.6%
Energy	-	12.5%
Utilities	-	5.0%

Return for Risk

PNQI vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNQI

PNQI Risk / Return Rank: 7
PNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 8

RFDA

RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 83
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 79
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNQI vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PNQI	RFDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	2.55	-2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	3.52	-3.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.47	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	5.44	-5.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.25	19.87	-20.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PNQI vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNQI Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the RFDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNQI and RFDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PNQI	RFDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	2.55	-2.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	0.84	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.79	-0.27

Drawdowns

PNQI vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than RFDA's maximum drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and RFDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PNQI	RFDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.70%	-34.60%	-25.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.85%	-5.45%	-19.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.85%	-19.35%	-5.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.56%	-19.35%	-40.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.07%	-0.92%	-15.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.96%	-3.74%	-9.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.52%	1.49%	+9.03%

Volatility

PNQI vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 2.66%. This indicates that PNQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PNQI	RFDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	2.66%	+2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.86%	8.47%	+5.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.07%	11.64%	+6.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.81%	15.73%	+11.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.29%	16.85%	+8.44%

PNQI vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

PNQI vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

PNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than RFDA's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	1.77%	1.89%	2.23%	2.68%	3.57%	1.44%	1.62%	1.87%	2.44%	1.90%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PNQI and RFDA in my portfolio?

PNQI and RFDA have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PNQI or RFDA?

PNQI has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to RFDA (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNQI dropped -59.70% vs RFDA's -34.60%.

Which ETF is better, PNQI or RFDA?

On 5-year performance, RFDA leads with 13.17% vs 0.11% for PNQI. On fees, RFDA is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PNQI or RFDA?

Over the 5-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 13.17% return vs 0.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PNQI or RFDA?

RFDA is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PNQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PNQI or RFDA?

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.02% for PNQI.

What is the main difference between PNQI and RFDA?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.52% for RFDA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.