PNQI vs. QUS
PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PNQI tracks the NASDAQ Internet Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PNQI returned 11.73%/yr vs 13.99%/yr for QUS. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PNQI charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
PNQI vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -18.59% return, which is significantly lower than QUS's 5.96% return. Over the past 10 years, PNQI has underperformed QUS with an annualized return of 11.73%, while QUS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.
PNQI
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -8.54%
- YTD
- -18.59%
- 6M
- -19.34%
- 1Y
- -13.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- -3.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
QUS
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 4.89%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
PNQI vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | -18.59% | 15.56% | 29.44% | 60.69% | -47.92% | -5.57% | 61.36% | 28.76% | -5.08% | 40.05% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 5.96% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 32.45% | -3.66% | 21.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNQI and QUS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015 | 0.66 |
The correlation between PNQI and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PNQI vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PNQI
QUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PNQI
QUS
Communication Services
PNQI
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
PNQI
QUS
Financial Services
PNQI
QUS
Real Estate
PNQI
QUS
Industrials
PNQI
QUS
Healthcare
PNQI
QUS
Basic Materials
PNQI
-
QUS
Consumer Defensive
PNQI
-
QUS
Energy
PNQI
-
QUS
Utilities
PNQI
-
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNQI vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
PNQI
QUS
PNQI vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PNQI | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.32 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 2.38 | -2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 10.45 | -11.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PNQI vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNQI | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -33.78% | -25.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.85% | -6.85% | -18.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | -13.94% | -10.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.56% | -22.30% | -37.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.70% | -33.78% | -25.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.06% | -1.69% | -21.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.98% | -3.69% | -9.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.55% | 1.55% | +10.00% |
Volatility
PNQI vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.71%. This indicates that PNQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNQI | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 2.71% | +4.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.12% | 6.94% | +8.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.83% | 9.16% | +9.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.93% | 14.34% | +12.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 16.43% | +8.89% |
PNQI vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PNQI vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
PNQI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.32% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PNQI and QUS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNQI has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to QUS (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNQI dropped -59.70% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 10-year performance, QUS leads with 13.99% vs 11.73% for PNQI. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QUS has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 11.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PNQI.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for PNQI.
PNQI tracks NASDAQ Internet Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.15% for QUS.
QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PNQI and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer