PNQI vs. BBUS
PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PNQI tracks the NASDAQ Internet Index while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PNQI returned 0.30%/yr vs 13.53%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PNQI charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
PNQI vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -10.35% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 11.12% return.
PNQI
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- -10.35%
- 6M
- -11.05%
- 1Y
- -2.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.85%
BBUS
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.53%
- 10Y*
- —
PNQI vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | -10.35% | 15.56% | 29.44% | 60.69% | -47.92% | -5.57% | 61.36% | 5.50% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 11.12% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNQI and BBUS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.81 |
The correlation between PNQI and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
PNQI vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PNQI
BBUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PNQI
BBUS
Communication Services
PNQI
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
PNQI
BBUS
Financial Services
PNQI
BBUS
Real Estate
PNQI
BBUS
Industrials
PNQI
BBUS
Healthcare
PNQI
BBUS
Basic Materials
PNQI
-
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
PNQI
-
BBUS
Energy
PNQI
-
BBUS
Utilities
PNQI
-
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNQI vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
PNQI
BBUS
PNQI vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PNQI | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.43 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 3.06 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 14.04 | -14.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PNQI | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 | 2.37 | -2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.80 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.84 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
PNQI vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNQI | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -35.35% | -24.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.85% | -9.21% | -15.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | -19.01% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.56% | -25.46% | -34.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.27% | -0.28% | -14.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.96% | -5.45% | -7.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.56% | 2.00% | +8.56% |
Volatility
PNQI vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.84%. This indicates that PNQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNQI | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 2.84% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.87% | 8.97% | +4.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 11.87% | +6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.80% | 17.03% | +9.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.29% | 19.59% | +5.70% |
PNQI vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
PNQI vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
PNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PNQI and BBUS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNQI has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to BBUS (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNQI dropped -59.70% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.53% vs 0.30% for PNQI. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PNQI.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.02% for PNQI.
PNQI tracks NASDAQ Internet Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PNQI and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer