PNNT vs. BAC
PNNT (PennantPark Investment Corporation) and BAC (Bank of America Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — PNNT in Asset Management, BAC in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, PNNT returned 7.07%/yr vs 18.19%/yr for BAC. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PNNT vs. BAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNNT achieves a -29.84% return, which is significantly lower than BAC's 3.72% return. Over the past 10 years, PNNT has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 7.07%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.19% annualized return.
PNNT
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- -29.84%
- 6M
- -27.65%
- 1Y
- -33.82%
- 3Y*
- 0.38%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.07%
BAC
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 13.82%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 29.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 18.19%
PNNT vs. BAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNNT PennantPark Investment Corporation | -29.84% | -2.96% | 16.56% | 37.25% | -8.90% | 61.71% | -17.99% | 14.30% | 2.05% | -0.65% |
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 3.72% | 28.04% | 33.85% | 4.83% | -23.82% | 49.61% | -11.63% | 46.19% | -15.00% | 35.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNNT and BAC is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007 | 0.41 |
Fundamentals
PNNT:
$302.41
BAC:
$4.19
PNNT:
0.01
BAC:
13.36
PNNT:
0.00
BAC:
5.36
PNNT:
2.20
BAC:
2.42
PNNT:
$85.01M
BAC:
$174.85B
PNNT:
$24.12M
BAC:
$110.47B
PNNT:
$16.10M
BAC:
$41.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNNT vs. BAC — Risk / Return Rank
PNNT
BAC
PNNT vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PNNT | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.24 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 1.64 | -2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.65 | 4.21 | -5.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PNNT vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNNT drawdown since its inception was -82.16%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNNT and BAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNNT | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.16% | -93.10% | +10.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.61% | -17.93% | -24.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.61% | -27.51% | -15.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.61% | -46.64% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.14% | -48.95% | -20.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.28% | -0.36% | -39.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.29% | -28.30% | +13.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.58% | 6.96% | +13.62% |
Volatility
PNNT vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison
PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a higher volatility of 9.97% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 5.49%. This indicates that PNNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNNT | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.97% | 5.49% | +4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.95% | 16.57% | +7.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.06% | 21.62% | +5.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 26.89% | -3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.76% | 30.68% | +2.08% |
Dividends
PNNT vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison
PNNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.94%, more than BAC's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.72% | 1.96% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
PNNT PennantPark Investment Corporation | 24.94% | 16.11% | 12.85% | 11.65% | 10.43% | 6.93% | 11.71% | 11.03% | 11.30% | 10.42% | 14.62% | 18.12% |
Financials
PNNT vs. BAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PennantPark Investment Corporation and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PNNT and BAC have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNNT has higher volatility (9.97%) compared to BAC (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNNT dropped -82.16% vs BAC's -93.10%.
BAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PNNT and BAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer