PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PNNT vs. PFLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


PNNTPFLT
YTD Return12.61%1.02%
1Y Return18.62%13.56%
3Y Return (Ann)12.52%3.47%
5Y Return (Ann)16.06%10.13%
10Y Return (Ann)7.89%7.67%
Sharpe Ratio1.141.02
Sortino Ratio1.601.38
Omega Ratio1.221.19
Calmar Ratio1.281.24
Martin Ratio3.382.49
Ulcer Index5.77%5.70%
Daily Std Dev17.11%13.97%
Max Drawdown-82.16%-69.77%
Current Drawdown-7.24%-5.97%

Fundamentals


PNNTPFLT
Market Cap$459.03M$821.58M
EPS$0.66$1.66
PE Ratio10.596.74
PEG Ratio0.280.27
Total Revenue (TTM)$70.58M$120.75M
Gross Profit (TTM)$47.35M$93.87M
EBITDA (TTM)$54.21M$101.73M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between PNNT and PFLT is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

PNNT vs. PFLT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PNNT achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly higher than PFLT's 1.02% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PNNT having a 7.89% annualized return and PFLT not far behind at 7.67%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.91%
2.98%
PNNT
PFLT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PNNT vs. PFLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PNNT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PNNT, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PNNT, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.60
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PNNT, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PNNT, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.28
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PNNT, currently valued at 3.38, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.38
PFLT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PFLT, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.02
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PFLT, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.38
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PFLT, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PFLT, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PFLT, currently valued at 2.49, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.49

PNNT vs. PFLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNNT Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the PFLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNNT and PFLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.14
1.02
PNNT
PFLT

Dividends

PNNT vs. PFLT - Dividend Comparison

PNNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.71%, more than PFLT's 11.00% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
12.71%11.65%10.43%6.93%11.71%11.03%11.30%10.42%14.62%18.12%11.75%9.66%
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
11.00%9.98%10.38%8.93%10.83%9.36%9.85%8.31%8.08%10.04%7.87%7.63%

Drawdowns

PNNT vs. PFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNNT drawdown since its inception was -82.16%, which is greater than PFLT's maximum drawdown of -69.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNNT and PFLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-7.24%
-5.97%
PNNT
PFLT

Volatility

PNNT vs. PFLT - Volatility Comparison

PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) at 5.53%. This indicates that PNNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.95%
5.53%
PNNT
PFLT

Financials

PNNT vs. PFLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PennantPark Investment Corporation and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items