PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PNNT vs. PFLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

PNNT vs. PFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PNNT vs. PFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
-23.23%-2.96%16.56%37.25%-8.90%61.71%-17.99%14.30%2.05%-0.65%
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
-10.49%-4.17%0.62%23.05%-5.53%32.64%-1.41%15.52%-8.29%5.49%

Fundamentals

EPS

PNNT:

$0.39

PFLT:

$0.63

PE Ratio

PNNT:

11.07

PFLT:

12.70

PEG Ratio

PNNT:

0.06

PFLT:

0.07

PS Ratio

PNNT:

3.54

PFLT:

3.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

PNNT:

$80.02M

PFLT:

$149.03M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PNNT:

$36.06M

PFLT:

$48.69M

EBITDA (TTM)

PNNT:

$26.12M

PFLT:

$39.60M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNNT achieves a -23.23% return, which is significantly lower than PFLT's -10.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PNNT has outperformed PFLT with an annualized return of 8.85%, while PFLT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.48% annualized return.


PNNT

1D
-2.67%
1M
-12.47%
YTD
-23.23%
6M
-27.74%
1Y
-27.99%
3Y*
7.82%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
8.85%

PFLT

1D
-0.37%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-10.49%
6M
-1.46%
1Y
-18.09%
3Y*
2.30%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
6.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PNNT vs. PFLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNNT
PNNT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PNNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNNT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PNNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNNT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

PFLT
PFLT Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNNT vs. PFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PNNTPFLTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.01

-0.77

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.34

-0.93

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.87

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-0.85

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.97

-1.70

-0.27

PNNT vs. PFLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNNT Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the PFLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNNT and PFLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PNNTPFLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.01

-0.77

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.13

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.23

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.24

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between PNNT and PFLT is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PNNT vs. PFLT - Dividend Comparison

PNNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.97%, more than PFLT's 15.36% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
21.97%16.11%12.85%11.65%10.43%6.93%11.71%11.03%11.30%10.42%14.62%18.12%
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
15.36%13.27%11.25%9.98%10.38%8.93%10.83%9.24%9.59%8.31%8.08%10.04%

Drawdowns

PNNT vs. PFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNNT drawdown since its inception was -82.16%, which is greater than PFLT's maximum drawdown of -69.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNNT and PFLT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PNNTPFLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.16%

-69.77%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.80%

-21.90%

-12.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.80%

-29.64%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.14%

-69.77%

+0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.65%

-20.17%

-14.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.10%

-8.01%

-7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.95%

10.91%

+3.04%

Volatility

PNNT vs. PFLT - Volatility Comparison

PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a higher volatility of 11.47% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) at 7.48%. This indicates that PNNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PNNTPFLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.47%

7.48%

+3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.93%

15.40%

+4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.77%

23.55%

+4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.20%

20.93%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.55%

28.80%

+3.75%

Financials

PNNT vs. PFLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PennantPark Investment Corporation and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-60.00M-40.00M-20.00M0.0020.00M40.00M60.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
27.25M
29.47M
(PNNT) Total Revenue
(PFLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PNNT vs. PFLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PennantPark Investment Corporation and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
47.2%
0
Portfolio components
PNNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Investment Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.87M and revenue of 27.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.2%.

PFLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 29.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PNNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Investment Corporation reported an operating income of 7.65M and revenue of 27.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.1%.

PFLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 29.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

PNNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Investment Corporation reported a net income of 8.96M and revenue of 27.25M, resulting in a net margin of 32.9%.

PFLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 29.47M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.