PortfoliosLab logo
PNNT vs. PFLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PNNT and PFLT is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PNNT vs. PFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PNNT:

0.31

PFLT:

0.12

Sortino Ratio

PNNT:

0.59

PFLT:

0.24

Omega Ratio

PNNT:

1.09

PFLT:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

PNNT:

0.44

PFLT:

0.09

Martin Ratio

PNNT:

1.13

PFLT:

0.30

Ulcer Index

PNNT:

7.01%

PFLT:

5.99%

Daily Std Dev

PNNT:

24.06%

PFLT:

20.44%

Max Drawdown

PNNT:

-82.16%

PFLT:

-69.77%

Current Drawdown

PNNT:

-1.80%

PFLT:

-7.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PNNT:

$444.67M

PFLT:

$1.01B

EPS

PNNT:

$0.84

PFLT:

$0.85

PE Ratio

PNNT:

8.11

PFLT:

12.04

PEG Ratio

PNNT:

0.28

PFLT:

0.27

PS Ratio

PNNT:

3.09

PFLT:

4.71

PB Ratio

PNNT:

0.90

PFLT:

0.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

PNNT:

$291.60M

PFLT:

$215.76M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PNNT:

$66.68M

PFLT:

$90.79M

EBITDA (TTM)

PNNT:

$32.78M

PFLT:

$83.63M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNNT achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly higher than PFLT's -0.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PNNT has outperformed PFLT with an annualized return of 9.20%, while PFLT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.99% annualized return.


PNNT

YTD

3.33%

1M

10.45%

6M

5.27%

1Y

7.34%

3Y*

14.97%

5Y*

32.17%

10Y*

9.20%

PFLT

YTD

-0.76%

1M

7.47%

6M

-1.63%

1Y

2.42%

3Y*

7.91%

5Y*

16.86%

10Y*

6.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PNNT vs. PFLT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNNT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PNNT is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PNNT is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PNNT is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PNNT is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PNNT is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PNNT is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

PFLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PFLT is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PFLT is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PFLT is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PFLT is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PFLT is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PFLT is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PNNT vs. PFLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PNNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the PFLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNNT and PFLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PNNT vs. PFLT - Dividend Comparison

PNNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.91%, more than PFLT's 11.91% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
13.91%12.85%11.65%10.43%6.93%11.71%11.03%11.30%10.42%14.62%18.12%11.75%
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
11.91%11.25%9.98%10.38%8.93%10.83%9.36%9.85%8.31%8.08%10.04%7.87%

Drawdowns

PNNT vs. PFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNNT drawdown since its inception was -82.16%, which is greater than PFLT's maximum drawdown of -69.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNNT and PFLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PNNT vs. PFLT - Volatility Comparison

PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) at 5.78%. This indicates that PNNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PNNT vs. PFLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PennantPark Investment Corporation and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20212022202320242025
210.41M
67.01M
(PNNT) Total Revenue
(PFLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items