PMPIX vs. RMQHX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX).
PMPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 2, 2002. RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014.
Performance
PMPIX vs. RMQHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PMPIX vs. RMQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMPIX ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund | -0.39% | 273.51% | 5.35% | -1.78% | -20.47% | -14.71% | 28.27% | 72.99% | -21.10% | 6.55% |
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -19.03% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMPIX achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly higher than RMQHX's -19.03% return. Over the past 10 years, PMPIX has underperformed RMQHX with an annualized return of 16.99%, while RMQHX has yielded a comparatively higher 30.11% annualized return.
PMPIX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -35.81%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 139.44%
- 3Y*
- 50.72%
- 5Y*
- 24.38%
- 10Y*
- 16.99%
RMQHX
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -16.37%
- YTD
- -19.03%
- 6M
- -16.54%
- 1Y
- 31.59%
- 3Y*
- 33.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.52%
- 10Y*
- 30.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PMPIX vs. RMQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMPIX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than RMQHX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PMPIX vs. RMQHX — Risk / Return Rank
PMPIX
RMQHX
PMPIX vs. RMQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMPIX | RMQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.13 | 0.67 | +1.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | 1.28 | +0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.18 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 0.96 | +2.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.61 | 3.35 | +8.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMPIX | RMQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 0.67 | +1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.34 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.65 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.63 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between PMPIX and RMQHX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PMPIX vs. RMQHX - Dividend Comparison
PMPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than RMQHX's 42.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMPIX ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund | 0.43% | 0.43% | 1.89% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 42.94% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% |
Drawdowns
PMPIX vs. RMQHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMPIX drawdown since its inception was -94.34%, which is greater than RMQHX's maximum drawdown of -63.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMPIX and RMQHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMPIX | RMQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.34% | -63.21% | -31.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.66% | -25.11% | -16.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.05% | -63.21% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.94% | -63.21% | -2.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.59% | -24.97% | -17.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.86% | -13.01% | -46.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.13% | 7.21% | +4.92% |
Volatility
PMPIX vs. RMQHX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) has a higher volatility of 23.48% compared to Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) at 11.12%. This indicates that PMPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PMPIX | RMQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.48% | 11.12% | +12.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.98% | 25.22% | +30.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.44% | 47.33% | +20.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.07% | 46.20% | +5.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.81% | 46.31% | +6.50% |