PMMF vs. TENM
PMMF (iShares Prime Money Market ETF) and TENM (iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMMF is a Money Market fund actively managed by BlackRock, while TENM is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMMF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TENM.
Performance
PMMF vs. TENM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMMF achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than TENM's 6.40% return.
PMMF
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TENM
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 6.40%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMMF vs. TENM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMMF iShares Prime Money Market ETF | 1.52% | 0.74% |
TENM iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF | 6.40% | 2.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMMF and TENM is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMMF vs. TENM — Risk / Return Rank
PMMF
TENM
PMMF vs. TENM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF) and iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMMF | TENM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 19.72 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 95.22 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 38.37 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 161.17 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,488.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMMF | TENM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 11.97 | 2.24 | +9.73 |
Drawdowns
PMMF vs. TENM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.13%, smaller than the maximum TENM drawdown of -3.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMMF and TENM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMMF | TENM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.13% | -3.61% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.70% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility
PMMF vs. TENM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMMF | TENM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 6.53% | -6.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 6.53% | -6.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 6.53% | -6.19% |
PMMF vs. TENM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMMF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TENM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMMF vs. TENM - Dividend Comparison
PMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than TENM's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PMMF iShares Prime Money Market ETF | 3.83% | 3.59% |
TENM iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF | 0.28% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMMF and TENM have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PMMF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PMMF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TENM.
PMMF has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 0.28% for TENM.
PMMF is categorized as Money Market, while TENM is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PMMF and 0.50% for TENM.
Find the right allocation for PMMF and TENM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer