PMMF vs. SGVT
PMMF (iShares Prime Money Market ETF) and SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) are both Money Market funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PMMF returned 3.97% vs 3.73% for SGVT. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMMF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for SGVT.
Performance
PMMF vs. SGVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMMF achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than SGVT's 1.58% return.
PMMF
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGVT
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMMF vs. SGVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMMF iShares Prime Money Market ETF | 1.70% | 2.33% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 1.58% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMMF and SGVT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMMF vs. SGVT — Risk / Return Rank
PMMF
SGVT
PMMF vs. SGVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF) and Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMMF | SGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +8.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 34.90 | 29.30 | +5.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 160.07 | 138.57 | +21.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,439.37 | 1,254.38 | +184.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMMF vs. SGVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.13%, which is greater than SGVT's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMMF and SGVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMMF | SGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.13% | -0.03% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -0.03% | +0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Volatility
PMMF vs. SGVT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF) is 0.06%, while Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) has a volatility of 0.10%. This indicates that PMMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMMF | SGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.06% | 0.10% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.13% | 0.15% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21% | 0.22% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.35% | 0.22% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.35% | 0.22% | +0.13% |
PMMF vs. SGVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMMF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SGVT's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMMF vs. SGVT - Dividend Comparison
PMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than SGVT's 3.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PMMF iShares Prime Money Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.59% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 3.11% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMMF and SGVT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGVT has higher volatility (0.10%) compared to PMMF (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMMF dropped -0.13% vs SGVT's -0.03%.
On 1-year performance, PMMF leads with 3.97% vs 3.73% for SGVT. On fees, PMMF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PMMF has performed better with a 3.97% return vs 3.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PMMF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SGVT.
PMMF has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 3.11% for SGVT.
They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PMMF and 0.28% for SGVT.
PMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.46 vs 17.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMMF and SGVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer