PMBMX vs. VTWO
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO).
PMBMX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Dec 6, 2000. VTWO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
PMBMX vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PMBMX vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMBMX Principal MidCap Fund | -11.17% | 1.16% | 23.38% | 25.36% | -23.52% | 24.63% | 17.69% | 49.09% | -7.28% | 24.73% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.54% | 12.90% | 11.55% | 17.08% | -20.49% | 14.79% | 20.22% | 25.81% | -11.15% | 14.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMBMX achieves a -11.17% return, which is significantly lower than VTWO's 1.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PMBMX has outperformed VTWO with an annualized return of 11.26%, while VTWO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.
PMBMX
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -7.75%
- YTD
- -11.17%
- 6M
- -13.90%
- 1Y
- -10.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
VTWO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- 26.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PMBMX vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMBMX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWO's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PMBMX vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank
PMBMX
VTWO
PMBMX vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMBMX | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | 1.15 | -1.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | 1.70 | -2.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.22 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 1.91 | -2.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.55 | 7.12 | -8.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMBMX | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | 1.15 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.16 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.43 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.48 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between PMBMX and VTWO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PMBMX vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison
PMBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, more than VTWO's 1.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMBMX Principal MidCap Fund | 7.22% | 6.41% | 6.86% | 2.68% | 3.43% | 8.51% | 1.15% | 9.00% | 12.79% | 3.39% | 2.16% | 6.38% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
PMBMX vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMBMX drawdown since its inception was -50.69%, which is greater than VTWO's maximum drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBMX and VTWO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMBMX | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.69% | -41.19% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.53% | -13.90% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.48% | -31.88% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.60% | -41.19% | +0.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.13% | -7.29% | -9.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -8.47% | +1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.65% | 3.74% | +2.91% |
Volatility
PMBMX vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX) is 5.25%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that PMBMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PMBMX | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 7.38% | -2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 14.44% | -3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.40% | 23.29% | -4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 22.49% | -3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 23.04% | -3.92% |