PortfoliosLab logo
PMBMX vs. VO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PMBMX and VO is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

PMBMX vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PMBMX:

0.81

VO:

0.75

Sortino Ratio

PMBMX:

1.14

VO:

1.08

Omega Ratio

PMBMX:

1.15

VO:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

PMBMX:

0.82

VO:

0.67

Martin Ratio

PMBMX:

2.72

VO:

2.42

Ulcer Index

PMBMX:

5.16%

VO:

5.25%

Daily Std Dev

PMBMX:

19.05%

VO:

18.33%

Max Drawdown

PMBMX:

-50.69%

VO:

-58.88%

Current Drawdown

PMBMX:

-4.89%

VO:

-4.27%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PMBMX having a 2.64% return and VO slightly higher at 2.74%. Over the past 10 years, PMBMX has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 11.37%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.35% annualized return.


PMBMX

YTD

2.64%

1M

3.40%

6M

-4.89%

1Y

14.21%

3Y*

13.66%

5Y*

12.94%

10Y*

11.37%

VO

YTD

2.74%

1M

5.17%

6M

-4.27%

1Y

12.64%

3Y*

9.32%

5Y*

12.66%

10Y*

9.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Principal MidCap Fund

Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF

PMBMX vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMBMX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.04% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PMBMX vs. VO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMBMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PMBMX is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PMBMX is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PMBMX is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PMBMX is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PMBMX is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PMBMX is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VO is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VO is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VO is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VO is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VO is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VO is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PMBMX vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PMBMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the VO Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMBMX and VO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PMBMX vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

PMBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than VO's 1.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PMBMX
Principal MidCap Fund
3.35%3.44%2.68%3.43%8.51%1.15%4.50%12.79%3.39%2.16%6.38%5.04%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.53%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%1.29%

Drawdowns

PMBMX vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMBMX drawdown since its inception was -50.69%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBMX and VO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PMBMX vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.46%. This indicates that PMBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...