PMAR vs. QTAP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - PMAR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect March Series Index, while QTAP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator. PMAR is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PMAR returned 9.38%/yr vs 12.30%/yr for QTAP. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

PMAR vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMAR achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.57% return.

PMAR

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.69%
• 6M: 6.19%
• YTD: 6.96%
• 1Y: 13.15%
• 3Y*: 12.05%
• 5Y*: 9.38%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.84%

QTAP

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 12.76%
• YTD: 13.57%
• 1Y: 20.30%
• 3Y*: 18.84%
• 5Y*: 12.30%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March	$534.56K	$535.71K	$824.90K
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	$235.81K	$225.86K	$220.48K

PMAR vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March	6.96%	11.82%	12.83%	15.95%	-2.65%	6.86%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	13.57%	19.36%	17.34%	43.32%	-25.87%	15.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PMAR and QTAP is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	0.84

The correlation between PMAR and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

PMAR vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PMAR	QTAP
Technology	37.9%	50.7%
Financial Services	11.7%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.0%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	12.5%
Healthcare	9.1%	5.1%
Industrials	8.4%	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	8.7%
Energy	3.0%	0.7%
Utilities	2.3%	1.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.3%

Return for Risk

PMAR vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PMAR

PMAR Risk / Return Rank: 90
PMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PMAR vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PMAR	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.95	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	4.74	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.69	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	6.93	-3.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.29	33.23	-15.94

PMAR vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMAR Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMAR and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PMAR vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMAR drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, smaller than the maximum QTAP drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAR and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMAR	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.18%	-29.44%	+12.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.11%	-2.81%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.32%	-13.03%	+3.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.84%	-29.44%	+18.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-1.05%	+0.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-4.91%	+3.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	0.59%	+0.13%

Volatility

PMAR vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) is 1.51%, while Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that PMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PMAR	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	2.75%	-1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.58%	5.69%	-1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.46%	6.61%	-1.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.20%	18.92%	-10.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.63%	18.57%	-7.94%

PMAR vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PMAR and QTAP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

PMAR vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMAR nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMAR and QTAP in my portfolio?

PMAR and QTAP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PMAR or QTAP?

QTAP has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to PMAR (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAR dropped -17.18% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, PMAR or QTAP?

On 5-year performance, QTAP leads with 12.30% vs 9.38% for PMAR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PMAR or QTAP?

Over the 5-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 12.30% return vs 9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMAR or QTAP?

PMAR and QTAP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMAR or QTAP?

PMAR and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PMAR and QTAP?

PMAR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QTAP is Leveraged Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.