PM vs. VGT
PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) is a stock, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, PM returned 11.68%/yr vs 24.44%/yr for VGT. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PM vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PM achieves a 20.40% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 21.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PM has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 11.68%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.44% annualized return.
PM
- 1D
- 4.95%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- YTD
- 20.40%
- 1Y
- 7.34%
- 3Y*
- 29.70%
- 5Y*
- 19.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.68%
VGT
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- 6M
- 20.62%
- YTD
- 21.52%
- 1Y
- 35.18%
- 3Y*
- 26.94%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- 24.44%
PM vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 20.40% | 37.99% | 34.34% | -1.85% | 12.31% | 20.78% | 3.69% | 35.02% | -33.30% | 19.85% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 21.52% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between PM and VGT is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2008 | 0.28 |
The correlation between PM and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PM vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
PM
VGT
PM vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.26 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 2.16 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | 6.19 | -5.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PM vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PM drawdown since its inception was -42.87%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PM and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.87% | -54.63% | +11.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.28% | -16.40% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.64% | -27.23% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.78% | -35.07% | +12.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.87% | -35.07% | -7.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -9.06% | +8.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.00% | -7.94% | -2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.83% | 5.70% | +5.13% |
Volatility
PM vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) has a higher volatility of 9.83% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 8.66%. This indicates that PM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.83% | 8.66% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.32% | 19.53% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.91% | 23.44% | +5.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.10% | 25.70% | -2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.59% | 24.81% | -0.22% |
Dividends
PM vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
PM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.10% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PM and VGT have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PM has higher volatility (9.83%) compared to VGT (8.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PM dropped -42.87% vs VGT's -54.63%.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PM and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer