PM vs. XLP
PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) is a stock, while XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, PM returned 11.06%/yr vs 7.20%/yr for XLP. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PM vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PM achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than XLP's 6.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PM has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 11.06%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.20% annualized return.
PM
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 18.07%
- 1Y
- -0.11%
- 3Y*
- 29.88%
- 5Y*
- 17.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
XLP
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.20%
PM vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 10.67% | 37.99% | 34.34% | -1.85% | 12.31% | 20.78% | 3.69% | 35.02% | -33.30% | 19.85% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 6.36% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between PM and XLP is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2008 | 0.64 |
The correlation between PM and XLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PM vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
PM
XLP
PM vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PM | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.04 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 0.20 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 0.40 | -0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PM | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 | 0.16 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.42 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.49 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.43 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
PM vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PM drawdown since its inception was -42.87%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PM and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PM | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.87% | -35.90% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.64% | -9.69% | -10.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.64% | -12.39% | -8.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.78% | -16.30% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.87% | -24.51% | -18.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.30% | -8.21% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.03% | -7.06% | -2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.75% | 4.93% | +5.82% |
Volatility
PM vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) has a higher volatility of 9.48% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 3.97%. This indicates that PM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PM | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.48% | 3.97% | +5.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.96% | 9.86% | +11.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.55% | 12.66% | +14.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.69% | 13.29% | +9.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.43% | 14.73% | +9.70% |
Dividends
PM vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
PM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than XLP's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.27% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.65% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PM and XLP have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PM has higher volatility (9.48%) compared to XLP (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PM dropped -42.87% vs XLP's -35.90%.
XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PM and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer