PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PM vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PM vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PM achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than XLP's 6.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PM has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 11.06%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.20% annualized return.


PM

1D
1.31%
1M
3.99%
YTD
10.67%
6M
18.07%
1Y
-0.11%
3Y*
29.88%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
11.06%

XLP

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
6.36%
6M
5.65%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
7.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PM vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
10.67%37.99%34.34%-1.85%12.31%20.78%3.69%35.02%-33.30%19.85%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
6.36%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PM and XLP is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2008

0.64

The correlation between PM and XLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PM vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PM
PM Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PM Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PM vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMXLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.04

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

0.20

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.01

0.40

-0.41

PM vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PM Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PM and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMXLPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

0.16

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.42

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.49

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.43

+0.09

Drawdowns

PM vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PM drawdown since its inception was -42.87%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PM and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.87%

-35.90%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.64%

-9.69%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.64%

-12.39%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.78%

-16.30%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.87%

-24.51%

-18.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.30%

-8.21%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.03%

-7.06%

-2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.75%

4.93%

+5.82%

Volatility

PM vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) has a higher volatility of 9.48% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 3.97%. This indicates that PM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.48%

3.97%

+5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.96%

9.86%

+11.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.55%

12.66%

+14.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.69%

13.29%

+9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.43%

14.73%

+9.70%

Dividends

PM vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

PM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than XLP's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
3.27%3.52%4.40%5.46%4.98%5.16%5.73%5.43%6.73%3.99%4.50%4.60%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.65%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


PM and XLP have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PM has higher volatility (9.48%) compared to XLP (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PM dropped -42.87% vs XLP's -35.90%.

XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PM and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer