PM vs. UL
Compare and contrast key facts about Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) and The Unilever Group (UL).
Performance
PM vs. UL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PM vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 4.00% | 37.99% | 34.34% | -1.85% | 12.31% | 20.78% | 3.69% | 35.02% | -33.30% | 19.85% |
UL The Unilever Group | -12.23% | 5.96% | 20.90% | -0.17% | -2.82% | -7.61% | 9.04% | 12.88% | -2.34% | 40.15% |
Fundamentals
PM:
$248.73B
UL:
$125.07B
PM:
$7.47
UL:
$5.06
PM:
22.14
UL:
11.25
PM:
2.10
UL:
2.20
PM:
6.27
UL:
1.22
PM:
$40.60B
UL:
$109.27B
PM:
$26.97B
UL:
$90.89B
PM:
$17.08B
UL:
$24.12B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PM achieves a 4.00% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -12.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PM has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 10.52%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.61% annualized return.
PM
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -10.71%
- YTD
- 4.00%
- 6M
- 4.76%
- 1Y
- 7.86%
- 3Y*
- 24.78%
- 5Y*
- 18.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
UL
- 1D
- -5.02%
- 1M
- -22.75%
- YTD
- -12.23%
- 6M
- -13.26%
- 1Y
- -12.18%
- 3Y*
- 2.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.53%
- 10Y*
- 4.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PM vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank
PM
UL
PM vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) and The Unilever Group (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PM | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.31 | -0.57 | +0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | -0.65 | +1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.92 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | -0.50 | +1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.06 | -1.56 | +2.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PM | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | -0.57 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.07 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.22 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.39 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between PM and UL is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PM vs. UL - Dividend Comparison
PM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than UL's 4.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.48% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
UL The Unilever Group | 4.07% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Drawdowns
PM vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PM drawdown since its inception was -42.87%, smaller than the maximum UL drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PM and UL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PM | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.87% | -53.55% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.64% | -23.04% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.78% | -26.59% | +3.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.87% | -30.13% | -12.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.11% | -23.04% | +10.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.03% | -10.55% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.75% | 7.48% | +2.27% |
Volatility
PM vs. UL - Volatility Comparison
Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) has a higher volatility of 9.52% compared to The Unilever Group (UL) at 7.96%. This indicates that PM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PM | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | 7.96% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.02% | 16.64% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.83% | 21.54% | +4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.80% | 20.52% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 21.48% | +2.54% |
Financials
PM vs. UL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Philip Morris International Inc. and The Unilever Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PM vs. UL - Profitability Comparison
PM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.78B and revenue of 10.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.4%.
UL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported an operating income of 3.42B and revenue of 10.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.
UL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
PM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a net income of 2.31B and revenue of 10.36B, resulting in a net margin of 22.3%.
UL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.