PLTZ vs. MSTZ
PLTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTZ returned -43.71% vs 299.04% for MSTZ. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
PLTZ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTZ achieves a 6.09% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -27.52% return.
PLTZ
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -9.00%
- 6M
- 7.43%
- YTD
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- -43.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- 6.51%
- 1M
- 38.88%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -27.52%
- 1Y
- 299.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTZ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 6.09% | -67.07% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -27.52% | 233.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTZ and MSTZ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTZ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
PLTZ
MSTZ
PLTZ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.33 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 3.55 | -4.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | 6.84 | -8.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTZ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTZ drawdown since its inception was -72.51%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTZ and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.51% | -99.38% | +26.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.64% | -84.89% | +28.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.06% | -97.53% | +32.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.80% | -94.55% | +38.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.61% | 43.95% | -6.34% |
Volatility
PLTZ vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ) is 31.88%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 55.03%. This indicates that PLTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.88% | 55.03% | -23.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 78.83% | 134.45% | -55.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.84% | 148.58% | -45.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.10% | 170.73% | -68.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.10% | 170.73% | -68.63% |
PLTZ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTZ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLTZ nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTZ and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (55.03%) compared to PLTZ (31.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTZ dropped -72.51% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 299.04% vs -43.71% for PLTZ. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, PLTZ has been the lower-risk option at 31.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 299.04% return vs -43.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for PLTZ.
PLTZ and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for PLTZ and 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTZ and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer