PLTZ vs. ZSL
PLTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF) and ZSL (ProShares UltraShort Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while ZSL is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x). PLTZ is actively managed, while ZSL is passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for ZSL.
Performance
PLTZ vs. ZSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTZ achieves a -7.75% return, which is significantly higher than ZSL's -61.84% return.
PLTZ
- 1D
- 10.54%
- 1M
- -18.06%
- YTD
- -7.75%
- 6M
- -18.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZSL
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- -61.84%
- 6M
- -76.77%
- 1Y
- -92.65%
- 3Y*
- -70.19%
- 5Y*
- -52.70%
- 10Y*
- -44.03%
PLTZ vs. ZSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | -7.75% | -64.39% |
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | -61.84% | -79.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTZ and ZSL is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTZ vs. ZSL — Risk / Return Rank
PLTZ
ZSL
PLTZ vs. ZSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ) and ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTZ | ZSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.67 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
PLTZ vs. ZSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTZ drawdown since its inception was -70.28%, smaller than the maximum ZSL drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTZ and ZSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTZ | ZSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.28% | -100.00% | +29.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -94.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -98.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.15% | -100.00% | +32.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.98% | -96.39% | +44.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 67.99% | — |
Volatility
PLTZ vs. ZSL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTZ | ZSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 32.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 105.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.32% | 119.75% | -18.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 101.32% | 74.08% | +27.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.32% | 65.19% | +36.13% |
PLTZ vs. ZSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ZSL's 1.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTZ vs. ZSL - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLTZ nor ZSL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTZ and ZSL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for ZSL.
PLTZ and ZSL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PLTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ZSL is Silver. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for PLTZ and 1.32% for ZSL.
Find the right allocation for PLTZ and ZSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer