PLTZ vs. ZSL

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

PLTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF) and ZSL (ProShares UltraShort Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while ZSL is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x). PLTZ is actively managed, while ZSL is passively managed. Over the past year, PLTZ returned -44.51% vs -86.59% for ZSL. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for ZSL.

Performance

PLTZ vs. ZSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ) and ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTZ achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly higher than ZSL's -42.43% return.

PLTZ

• 1D: -5.58%
• 1M: -15.72%
• 6M: 10.79%
• YTD: 7.26%
• 1Y: -44.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZSL

• 1D: -3.88%
• 1M: 26.40%
• 6M: -7.13%
• YTD: -42.43%
• 1Y: -86.59%
• 3Y*: -64.40%
• 5Y*: -49.31%
• 10Y*: -39.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTZ vs. ZSL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF	7.26%	-67.07%
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver	-42.43%	-79.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTZ and ZSL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025	0.16

Return for Risk

PLTZ vs. ZSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTZ

PLTZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
PLTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PLTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PLTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PLTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

ZSL

ZSL Risk / Return Rank: 2
ZSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ZSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ZSL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
ZSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ZSL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTZ vs. ZSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ) and ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTZ	ZSL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	-0.70	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	-1.61	+1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	0.83	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	-0.92	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.17	-1.20	+0.03

PLTZ vs. ZSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is higher than the ZSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTZ and ZSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTZ vs. ZSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTZ drawdown since its inception was -72.51%, smaller than the maximum ZSL drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTZ and ZSL.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTZ	ZSL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.51%	-100.00%	+27.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.18%	-93.81%	+36.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-98.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-99.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.68%	-99.99%	+35.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.74%	-96.39%	+40.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.11%	71.88%	-33.77%

Volatility

PLTZ vs. ZSL - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ) has a higher volatility of 34.06% compared to ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) at 25.91%. This indicates that PLTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTZ	ZSL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.06%	25.91%	+8.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	78.86%	102.65%	-23.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	103.30%	123.76%	-20.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	102.47%	75.53%	+26.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	102.47%	65.89%	+36.58%

PLTZ vs. ZSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ZSL's 1.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTZ vs. ZSL - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLTZ nor ZSL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTZ and ZSL in my portfolio?

PLTZ and ZSL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTZ or ZSL?

PLTZ has higher volatility (34.06%) compared to ZSL (25.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTZ dropped -72.51% vs ZSL's -100.00%.

Which ETF is better, PLTZ or ZSL?

On 1-year performance, PLTZ leads with -44.51% vs -86.59% for ZSL. On fees, PLTZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. On volatility, ZSL has been the lower-risk option at 25.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTZ or ZSL?

Over the 1-year period, PLTZ has performed better with a -44.51% return vs -86.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTZ or ZSL?

PLTZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for ZSL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTZ or ZSL?

PLTZ and ZSL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PLTZ and ZSL?

PLTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ZSL is Silver. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for PLTZ and 1.32% for ZSL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.