PLTZ vs. AIPO
PLTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while AIPO is a Building & Construction fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. PLTZ is actively managed, while AIPO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. PLTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
PLTZ vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PLTZ having a 48.68% return and AIPO slightly higher at 49.55%.
PLTZ
- 1D
- 4.41%
- 1M
- 22.41%
- YTD
- 48.68%
- 6M
- 76.10%
- 1Y
- -35.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIPO
- 1D
- -4.86%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 49.55%
- 6M
- 45.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTZ vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 48.68% | -43.68% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 49.55% | 9.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTZ and AIPO is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTZ vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
PLTZ
AIPO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTZ vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTZ | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTZ vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTZ drawdown since its inception was -72.51%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTZ and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTZ | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.51% | -17.31% | -55.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.04% | -4.86% | -46.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.64% | -4.44% | -51.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.01% | — | — |
Volatility
PLTZ vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTZ | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.92% | 35.59% | +67.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 101.96% | 35.59% | +66.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.96% | 35.59% | +66.37% |
PLTZ vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTZ vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
PLTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTZ and AIPO have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for PLTZ.
AIPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for PLTZ.
PLTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AIPO is Building & Construction. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for PLTZ and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for PLTZ and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer