PLTZ vs. GDXD
PLTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF) and GDXD (MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both Inverse Equities funds. PLTZ is actively managed, while GDXD is passively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GDXD.
Performance
PLTZ vs. GDXD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTZ achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly higher than GDXD's -51.20% return.
PLTZ
- 1D
- 13.03%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 4.28%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXD
- 1D
- 10.76%
- 1M
- -10.12%
- YTD
- -51.20%
- 6M
- -62.62%
- 1Y
- -93.08%
- 3Y*
- -84.24%
- 5Y*
- -72.73%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTZ vs. GDXD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 4.28% | -64.39% |
GDXD MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -51.20% | -86.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTZ and GDXD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTZ vs. GDXD — Risk / Return Rank
PLTZ
GDXD
PLTZ vs. GDXD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ) and MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTZ | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | -0.67 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
PLTZ vs. GDXD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTZ drawdown since its inception was -70.28%, smaller than the maximum GDXD drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTZ and GDXD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTZ | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.28% | -99.96% | +29.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -96.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -99.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.87% | -99.93% | +37.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -71.85% | +19.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 75.91% | — |
Volatility
PLTZ vs. GDXD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTZ | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 47.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 109.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.99% | 136.25% | -34.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 101.99% | 109.97% | -7.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.99% | 109.35% | -7.36% |
PLTZ vs. GDXD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTZ vs. GDXD - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLTZ nor GDXD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTZ and GDXD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDXD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDXD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for PLTZ.
PLTZ and GDXD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for PLTZ and 0.95% for GDXD.
Find the right allocation for PLTZ and GDXD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer