PLTW vs. RYLD

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. PLTW is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, PLTW returned -28.95% vs 26.26% for RYLD. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PLTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

PLTW vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -37.29% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 13.48% return.

PLTW

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -4.02%
• 6M: -20.95%
• YTD: -37.29%
• 1Y: -28.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -13.93%

RYLD

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 2.27%
• 6M: 10.40%
• YTD: 13.48%
• 1Y: 26.26%
• 3Y*: 8.70%
• 5Y*: 3.43%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	$2.58M	$2.73M	$3.69M
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	$9.87M	$9.43M	$9.08M

PLTW vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-37.29%	28.26%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	13.48%	1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and RYLD is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.43

PLTW vs. RYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PLTW	RYLD
Technology	20.0%	14.5%
Basic Materials	-	4.4%
Communication Services	-	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.6%
Energy	-	5.5%
Financial Services	-	17.8%
Healthcare	-	20.3%
Industrials	-	14.1%
Real Estate	-	6.8%
Utilities	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

PLTW vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 6
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 5

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 93
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 94
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLTW vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTW	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	2.50	-2.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.32	3.52	-3.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.52	-0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	4.19	-4.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	17.17	-18.09

PLTW vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTW and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, which is greater than RYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and RYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTW	RYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.27%	-41.53%	-15.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.27%	-6.29%	-50.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.71%	0.00%	-48.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.26%	-8.65%	-16.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.63%	1.53%	+30.10%

Volatility

PLTW vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 15.51% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.30%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTW	RYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.51%	2.30%	+13.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.86%	7.74%	+41.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.65%	10.58%	+52.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.45%	13.98%	+59.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.45%	17.04%	+56.41%

PLTW vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTW vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 137.47%, more than RYLD's 11.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	137.47%	72.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.50%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTW and RYLD in my portfolio?

PLTW and RYLD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTW or RYLD?

PLTW has higher volatility (15.51%) compared to RYLD (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -57.27% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

Which ETF is better, PLTW or RYLD?

On 1-year performance, RYLD leads with 26.26% vs -28.95% for PLTW. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTW or RYLD?

Over the 1-year period, RYLD has performed better with a 26.26% return vs -28.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTW or RYLD?

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTW or RYLD?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 137.47%, compared with 11.50% for RYLD.

What is the main difference between PLTW and RYLD?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTW and 0.60% for RYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.