PLTM vs. URA
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA).
PLTM and URA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PLTM is a passively managed fund by GraniteShares that tracks the performance of the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010. Both PLTM and URA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PLTM vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLTM vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -4.16% | 124.46% | -8.91% | -8.10% | 10.83% | -10.52% | 10.87% | 20.76% | -20.48% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 13.34% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | -3.54% | -11.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -4.16% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 13.34% return.
PLTM
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -16.88%
- YTD
- -4.16%
- 6M
- 25.15%
- 1Y
- 95.35%
- 3Y*
- 24.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- —
URA
- 1D
- 6.93%
- 1M
- -10.88%
- YTD
- 13.34%
- 6M
- 6.44%
- 1Y
- 121.39%
- 3Y*
- 40.54%
- 5Y*
- 24.65%
- 10Y*
- 16.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLTM vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PLTM vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
PLTM
URA
PLTM vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTM | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.92 | 2.48 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 2.97 | -0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 4.21 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.61 | 10.13 | -1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTM | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 2.48 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.58 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | -0.06 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTM and URA is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PLTM vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.30% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Drawdowns
PLTM vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and URA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTM | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -93.54% | +51.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.52% | -28.43% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.68% | -37.90% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.20% | -45.04% | +15.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -75.40% | +57.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.43% | 11.82% | -0.39% |
Volatility
PLTM vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) have volatilities of 16.47% and 16.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLTM | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.47% | 16.31% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.52% | 38.54% | +6.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.91% | 49.21% | +0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.39% | 43.00% | -10.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.82% | 37.23% | -6.41% |