PLTM vs. SMYY
PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) and SMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while SMYY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by GraniteShares. PLTM is passively managed, while SMYY is actively managed. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PLTM charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for SMYY.
Performance
PLTM vs. SMYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -19.56% return, which is significantly lower than SMYY's -6.99% return.
PLTM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- -22.81%
- YTD
- -19.56%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.60%
SMYY
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- 6M
- -7.72%
- YTD
- -6.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.27M | $1.47M | $3.03M | |
| $170.95K | $180.38K | $260.75K |
PLTM vs. SMYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -19.56% | 27.87% |
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | -6.99% | -27.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTM and SMYY is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTM vs. SMYY — Risk / Return Rank
PLTM
SMYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTM vs. SMYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTM | SMYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTM vs. SMYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -44.07%, which is greater than SMYY's maximum drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and SMYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTM | SMYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.07% | -38.26% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.58% | -37.89% | -2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.95% | -26.88% | +7.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.75% | — | — |
Volatility
PLTM vs. SMYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTM | SMYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.54% | 30.77% | +19.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.15% | 30.77% | +2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 30.77% | +0.37% |
PLTM vs. SMYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SMYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTM vs. SMYY - Dividend Comparison
PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 215.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 215.24% | 53.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTM and SMYY have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SMYY.
SMYY has the higher dividend yield at 215.24%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.
PLTM is categorized as Precious Metals, while SMYY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PLTM and 1.07% for SMYY.
Find the right allocation for PLTM and SMYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer