PLTM vs. SIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PLTM returned 9.22%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for SIL. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PLTM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.

Performance

PLTM vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -9.33% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's 4.75% return.

PLTM

• 1D: -3.82%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: -9.33%
• 6M: 11.67%
• 1Y: 71.85%
• 3Y*: 22.22%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

SIL

• 1D: -4.96%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 15.66%
• 1Y: 91.23%
• 3Y*: 49.15%
• 5Y*: 13.96%
• 10Y*: 10.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTM vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	-9.33%	124.46%	-8.91%	-8.10%	10.83%	-10.52%	10.87%	20.76%	-20.48%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	4.75%	166.16%	14.62%	1.31%	-22.83%	-18.35%	40.30%	34.78%	-17.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTM and SIL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2018	0.57

The correlation between PLTM and SIL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

PLTM vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PLTM	SIL
Real Estate	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	99.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.2%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PLTM vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTM

PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 36
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 30

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 48
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTM vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLTM	SIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.83	-0.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	2.17	-0.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.30	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	2.79	-0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.43	7.14	-2.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLTM vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the SIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTM and SIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLTM	SIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	1.83	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.36	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.14	+0.10

Drawdowns

PLTM vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and SIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTM	SIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.32%	-82.99%	+40.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.52%	-32.91%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.52%	-32.91%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.52%	-55.08%	+20.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.02%	-25.87%	-7.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.55%	-51.45%	+32.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.28%	12.82%	+3.46%

Volatility

PLTM vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) is 10.88%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that PLTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTM	SIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.88%	17.66%	-6.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.45%	41.57%	+3.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.40%	50.01%	+1.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.83%	39.21%	-6.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.98%	39.60%	-8.62%

PLTM vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTM vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.13%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTM and SIL in my portfolio?

PLTM and SIL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTM or SIL?

SIL has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to PLTM (10.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTM dropped -42.32% vs SIL's -82.99%.

Which ETF is better, PLTM or SIL?

On 5-year performance, SIL leads with 13.96% vs 9.22% for PLTM. On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PLTM has been the lower-risk option at 10.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTM or SIL?

Over the 5-year period, SIL has performed better with a 13.96% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTM or SIL?

PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTM or SIL?

SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.

What is the main difference between PLTM and SIL?

PLTM is categorized as Precious Metals, while SIL is Silver. PLTM tracks Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PLTM and 0.65% for SIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.