PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTM vs. SGDJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTM vs. SGDJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -19.61% return, which is significantly lower than SGDJ's -5.38% return.


PLTM

1D
-1.49%
1M
-14.13%
YTD
-19.61%
6M
-27.97%
1Y
27.29%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*

SGDJ

1D
-5.01%
1M
-6.84%
YTD
-5.38%
6M
-10.31%
1Y
72.25%
3Y*
50.80%
5Y*
17.28%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTM vs. SGDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PLTM
GraniteShares Platinum Trust
-19.61%124.46%-8.91%-8.10%10.83%-10.52%10.87%20.76%-20.92%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
-5.38%174.44%19.35%6.66%-27.60%-15.12%47.91%37.00%-16.31%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTM and SGDJ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2018

0.54

The correlation between PLTM and SGDJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTM vs. SGDJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTM
PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTM vs. SGDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTMSGDJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.25

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

1.97

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.49

5.11

-3.62

PLTM vs. SGDJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTM Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the SGDJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTM and SGDJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTM vs. SGDJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum SGDJ drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and SGDJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTMSGDJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.32%

-59.27%

+16.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.62%

-36.84%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.62%

-36.84%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.62%

-52.66%

+12.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.62%

-31.02%

-9.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.66%

-26.25%

+7.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.37%

14.18%

+4.19%

Volatility

PLTM vs. SGDJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) is 11.52%, while Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a volatility of 18.68%. This indicates that PLTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTMSGDJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.52%

18.68%

-7.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.02%

42.77%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.35%

50.78%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.99%

40.87%

-7.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.10%

40.96%

-9.86%

PLTM vs. SGDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PLTM and SGDJ have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

PLTM vs. SGDJ - Dividend Comparison

PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLTM
GraniteShares Platinum Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
8.85%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTM and SGDJ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGDJ has higher volatility (18.68%) compared to PLTM (11.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTM dropped -42.32% vs SGDJ's -59.27%.

On 5-year performance, SGDJ leads with 17.28% vs 7.99% for PLTM. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, PLTM has been the lower-risk option at 11.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 17.28% return vs 7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTM and SGDJ have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.85%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.

PLTM is categorized as Precious Metals, while SGDJ is Gold. PLTM tracks Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Sprott.

SGDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTM and SGDJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer