SGDJ vs. GDXJ
SGDJ (Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both Materials funds - SGDJ tracks the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index while GDXJ tracks the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ returned 12.36%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for GDXJ. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SGDJ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for GDXJ.
Performance
SGDJ vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGDJ achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's 1.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ has underperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 12.36%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 13.58% annualized return.
SGDJ
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 5.59%
- 6M
- 17.03%
- 1Y
- 84.64%
- 3Y*
- 51.51%
- 5Y*
- 18.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
GDXJ
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 70.87%
- 3Y*
- 48.33%
- 5Y*
- 18.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
SGDJ vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 5.59% | 174.44% | 19.35% | 6.66% | -27.60% | -15.12% | 47.91% | 37.00% | -25.63% | 5.94% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 1.93% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGDJ and GDXJ is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2015 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SGDJ and GDXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SGDJ vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SGDJ
GDXJ
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SGDJ
GDXJ
Communication Services
SGDJ
-
GDXJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SGDJ
-
GDXJ
-
Consumer Defensive
SGDJ
-
GDXJ
-
Energy
SGDJ
-
GDXJ
-
Financial Services
SGDJ
-
GDXJ
-
Healthcare
SGDJ
-
GDXJ
-
Industrials
SGDJ
-
GDXJ
-
Real Estate
SGDJ
-
GDXJ
-
Technology
SGDJ
-
GDXJ
-
Utilities
SGDJ
-
GDXJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGDJ vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
SGDJ
GDXJ
SGDJ vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGDJ | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | 1.44 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.09 | 1.85 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.48 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.76 | 6.25 | +1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGDJ | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 1.44 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.46 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.06 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
SGDJ vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGDJ drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDJ and GDXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGDJ | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -88.66% | +29.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.22% | -32.92% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.22% | -32.92% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.90% | -50.99% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.27% | -57.77% | -1.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.02% | -25.74% | +2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.25% | -60.51% | +34.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.40% | 13.06% | -0.66% |
Volatility
SGDJ vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) is 13.05%, while VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 16.14%. This indicates that SGDJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGDJ | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.05% | 16.14% | -3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.74% | 41.10% | -1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.57% | 49.94% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.31% | 41.10% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.74% | 44.04% | -3.30% |
SGDJ vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGDJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGDJ vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.93%, more than GDXJ's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 7.93% | 8.37% | 6.55% | 4.55% | 2.46% | 2.20% | 1.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.77% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SGDJ and GDXJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GDXJ has higher volatility (16.14%) compared to SGDJ (13.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDJ dropped -59.27% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.
On 10-year performance, GDXJ leads with 13.58% vs 12.36% for SGDJ. On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SGDJ has been the lower-risk option at 13.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 12.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for GDXJ.
SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 7.93%, compared with 2.28% for GDXJ.
SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDJ and 0.54% for GDXJ.
SGDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGDJ and GDXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer