PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTM vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PLTM vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PLTM vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PLTM
GraniteShares Platinum Trust
-4.16%124.46%-8.91%-8.10%10.83%-10.52%23.55%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-5.92%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -4.16% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's -5.92% return.


PLTM

1D
3.79%
1M
-16.88%
YTD
-4.16%
6M
25.15%
1Y
95.35%
3Y*
24.98%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*

QQQM

1D
3.37%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
-5.92%
6M
-3.59%
1Y
23.76%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PLTM vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PLTM vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTM
PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTM vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTMQQQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.92

1.06

+0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

1.65

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.89

+0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.61

6.96

+1.65

PLTM vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTM and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTMQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.06

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.59

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.63

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between PLTM and QQQM is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PLTM vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
PLTM
GraniteShares Platinum Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.53%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%

Drawdowns

PLTM vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and QQQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTMQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.32%

-35.04%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.52%

-12.55%

-21.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.68%

-35.04%

+0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.20%

-8.99%

-20.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.35%

-8.47%

-9.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.43%

3.41%

+8.02%

Volatility

PLTM vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) has a higher volatility of 16.47% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 6.48%. This indicates that PLTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PLTMQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.47%

6.48%

+9.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.52%

12.73%

+32.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.91%

22.42%

+27.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.39%

22.25%

+10.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.82%

22.27%

+8.55%