PLTM vs. MAAY
PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) and MAAY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while MAAY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. PLTM is passively managed, while MAAY is actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLTM charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for MAAY.
Performance
PLTM vs. MAAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -9.33% return, which is significantly higher than MAAY's -15.55% return.
PLTM
- 1D
- -3.82%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- YTD
- -9.33%
- 6M
- 11.67%
- 1Y
- 71.85%
- 3Y*
- 22.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- —
MAAY
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- -15.55%
- 6M
- -31.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTM vs. MAAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -9.33% | 33.49% |
MAAY GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF | -15.55% | -27.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTM and MAAY is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTM vs. MAAY — Risk / Return Rank
PLTM
MAAY
PLTM vs. MAAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF (MAAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTM | MAAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTM | MAAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | -1.93 | +2.17 |
Drawdowns
PLTM vs. MAAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum MAAY drawdown of -45.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and MAAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTM | MAAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -45.22% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.02% | -39.90% | +6.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.55% | -31.44% | +12.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.28% | — | — |
Volatility
PLTM vs. MAAY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTM | MAAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.40% | 30.16% | +21.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.83% | 30.16% | +2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.98% | 30.16% | +0.82% |
PLTM vs. MAAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MAAY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTM vs. MAAY - Dividend Comparison
PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 131.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MAAY GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF | 131.86% | 31.22% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTM and MAAY have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MAAY.
MAAY has the higher dividend yield at 131.86%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.
PLTM is categorized as Precious Metals, while MAAY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PLTM and 1.07% for MAAY.
Find the right allocation for PLTM and MAAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer