MAAY vs. LQTI
MAAY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAAY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
MAAY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAAY achieves a -15.66% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.42% return.
MAAY
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- -15.66%
- 6M
- -30.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 6.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAAY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAAY GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF | -15.66% | -27.95% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.42% | 0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAAY and LQTI is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAAY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
MAAY
LQTI
MAAY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF (MAAY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAAY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.94 | 0.92 | -2.86 |
Drawdowns
MAAY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAAY drawdown since its inception was -45.22%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAAY and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAAY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.22% | -3.41% | -41.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.98% | -1.18% | -38.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.38% | -0.88% | -30.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.10% | — |
Volatility
MAAY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAAY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.26% | 5.10% | +25.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.26% | 5.97% | +24.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.26% | 5.97% | +24.29% |
MAAY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAAY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAAY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
MAAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 132.04%, more than LQTI's 9.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.09% | 7.01% |
MAAY GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF | 132.04% | 31.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAAY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MAAY.
MAAY has the higher dividend yield at 132.04%, compared with 9.09% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MAAY and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for MAAY and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer