PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTM vs. IAUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTM vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -19.56% return, which is significantly lower than IAUM's -6.09% return.


PLTM

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.06%
6M
-22.81%
YTD
-19.56%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.60%

IAUM

1D
-1.46%
1M
-1.68%
6M
-16.73%
YTD
-6.09%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
27.63%
5Y*
17.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$77.48M$77.88M$93.44M
$1.27M$1.47M$3.03M

PLTM vs. IAUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PLTM
GraniteShares Platinum Trust
-19.56%124.46%-8.91%-8.10%10.83%-11.87%
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
-6.09%64.27%27.04%13.12%-0.49%3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTM and IAUM is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021

0.56

The correlation between PLTM and IAUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTM vs. IAUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLTM
PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUM
IAUM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IAUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLTM vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTMIAUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.17

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

0.88

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.20

1.90

-0.70

PLTM vs. IAUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTM Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the IAUM Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTM and IAUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTM vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -44.07%, which is greater than IAUM's maximum drawdown of -26.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and IAUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTMIAUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.07%

-26.31%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.07%

-26.31%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.07%

-26.31%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.07%

-26.31%

-17.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.58%

-24.95%

-15.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.95%

-5.87%

-13.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.75%

12.14%

+10.61%

Volatility

PLTM vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) at 6.29%. This indicates that PLTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTMIAUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

6.29%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.75%

23.21%

+15.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.54%

27.81%

+22.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.15%

18.33%

+14.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.14%

18.19%

+12.95%

PLTM vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUM's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTM vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLTM nor IAUM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTM and IAUM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTM has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to IAUM (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTM dropped -44.07% vs IAUM's -26.31%.

On 5-year performance, IAUM leads with 17.35% vs 8.97% for PLTM. On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IAUM has been the lower-risk option at 6.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IAUM has performed better with a 17.35% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PLTM.

PLTM and IAUM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PLTM is categorized as Precious Metals, while IAUM is Gold. PLTM tracks Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while IAUM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PLTM and 0.09% for IAUM.

IAUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTM and IAUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer