IAUM vs. SIVR
IAUM (iShares Gold Trust Micro) and SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAUM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IAUM returned 28.82%/yr vs 39.67%/yr for SIVR. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IAUM charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SIVR.
Performance
IAUM vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAUM achieves a -4.68% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's -13.39% return.
IAUM
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -8.79%
- YTD
- -4.68%
- 6M
- -8.59%
- 1Y
- 21.67%
- 3Y*
- 28.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR
- 1D
- -5.41%
- 1M
- -18.43%
- YTD
- -13.39%
- 6M
- -13.95%
- 1Y
- 69.45%
- 3Y*
- 39.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
IAUM vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | -4.68% | 64.27% | 27.04% | 13.12% | -0.49% | 3.87% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -13.39% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -11.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAUM and SIVR is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IAUM and SIVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAUM vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
IAUM
SIVR
IAUM vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAUM | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.25 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.48 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.40 | 3.18 | -0.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAUM vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAUM drawdown since its inception was -24.37%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUM and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAUM | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.37% | -75.85% | +51.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.37% | -47.16% | +22.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.37% | -47.16% | +22.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.81% | -47.16% | +23.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -47.83% | +42.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.06% | 21.88% | -12.82% |
Volatility
IAUM vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) is 8.12%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that IAUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAUM | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.12% | 14.32% | -6.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.11% | 59.26% | -35.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.27% | 60.27% | -33.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 36.61% | -18.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 32.12% | -14.02% |
IAUM vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAUM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAUM vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
Neither IAUM nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IAUM and SIVR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to IAUM (8.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUM dropped -24.37% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
On 3-year performance, SIVR leads with 39.67% vs 28.82% for IAUM. On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IAUM has been the lower-risk option at 8.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 39.67% return vs 28.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.
IAUM and SIVR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
IAUM is categorized as Gold, while SIVR is Silver. IAUM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: iShares and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IAUM and 0.30% for SIVR.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAUM and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer