PLTM vs. BILZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) and BILZ (PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while BILZ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. PLTM is passively managed, while BILZ is actively managed. Over the past year, PLTM returned 71.85% vs 3.91% for BILZ. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. PLTM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILZ.

Performance

PLTM vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -9.33% return, which is significantly lower than BILZ's 1.47% return.

PLTM

• 1D: -3.82%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: -9.33%
• 6M: 11.67%
• 1Y: 71.85%
• 3Y*: 22.22%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

BILZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTM vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	-9.33%	124.46%	-8.91%	7.10%
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund	1.47%	4.21%	5.25%	2.33%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTM and BILZ is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023	-0.06

Return for Risk

PLTM vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTM

PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 36
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 30

BILZ

BILZ Risk / Return Rank: 100
BILZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTM vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLTM	BILZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	19.09	-17.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	125.25	-123.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	53.31	-52.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	198.55	-196.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.43	2,000.92	-1,996.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLTM vs. BILZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the BILZ Sharpe Ratio of 19.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTM and BILZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLTM	BILZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	19.09	-17.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	10.48	-10.24

Drawdowns

PLTM vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and BILZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTM	BILZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.32%	-0.52%	-41.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.52%	-0.02%	-34.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.02%	0.00%	-33.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.55%	-0.01%	-18.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.28%	0.00%	+16.28%

Volatility

PLTM vs. BILZ - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) has a higher volatility of 10.88% compared to PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) at 0.07%. This indicates that PLTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTM	BILZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.88%	0.07%	+10.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.45%	0.14%	+45.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.40%	0.21%	+51.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.83%	0.43%	+32.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.98%	0.43%	+30.55%

PLTM vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTM vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison

PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BILZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund	4.07%	4.19%	4.95%	2.23%
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTM and BILZ in my portfolio?

PLTM and BILZ have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTM or BILZ?

PLTM has higher volatility (10.88%) compared to BILZ (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTM dropped -42.32% vs BILZ's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, PLTM or BILZ?

On 1-year performance, PLTM leads with 71.85% vs 3.91% for BILZ. On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BILZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTM or BILZ?

Over the 1-year period, PLTM has performed better with a 71.85% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTM or BILZ?

BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PLTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTM or BILZ?

BILZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.

What is the main difference between PLTM and BILZ?

PLTM is categorized as Precious Metals, while BILZ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PLTM and 0.14% for BILZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BILZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.09 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.