BILZ vs. BOXX

In the year-to-date period, BILZ achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than BOXX's 1.60% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BILZ has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BOXX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BILZ Sharpe Ratio is 12.88, which is comparable to the BOXX Sharpe Ratio of 13.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILZ and BOXX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BILZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than BOXX's 0.26% yield.

The maximum BILZ drawdown since its inception was -0.52%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILZ and BOXX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) is 0.07%, while Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) has a volatility of 0.12%. This indicates that BILZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.