PLTM vs. BGLD
PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) and BGLD (FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while BGLD is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest. PLTM is passively managed, while BGLD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PLTM returned 8.97%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for BGLD. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PLTM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for BGLD.
Performance
PLTM vs. BGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -19.56% return, which is significantly lower than BGLD's -4.01% return.
PLTM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- -22.81%
- YTD
- -19.56%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.60%
BGLD
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- 6M
- -7.99%
- YTD
- -4.01%
- 1Y
- 7.66%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $345.72K | $283.87K | $342.09K | |
| $1.27M | $1.47M | $3.03M |
PLTM vs. BGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -19.56% | 124.46% | -8.91% | -8.10% | 10.83% | -13.79% |
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF | -4.01% | 33.03% | 21.80% | 13.24% | -2.42% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTM and BGLD is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021 | 0.48 |
The correlation between PLTM and BGLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTM vs. BGLD — Risk / Return Rank
PLTM
BGLD
PLTM vs. BGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTM | BGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.15 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 0.77 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | 1.75 | -0.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTM vs. BGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -44.07%, which is greater than BGLD's maximum drawdown of -16.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and BGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTM | BGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.07% | -16.19% | -27.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.07% | -12.43% | -31.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.07% | -12.43% | -31.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.07% | -15.42% | -28.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.58% | -11.22% | -29.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.95% | -3.84% | -15.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.75% | 5.48% | +17.27% |
Volatility
PLTM vs. BGLD - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) at 2.84%. This indicates that PLTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTM | BGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 2.84% | +6.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.75% | 10.29% | +28.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.54% | 12.52% | +38.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.15% | 10.23% | +22.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 10.03% | +21.11% |
PLTM vs. BGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLD's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTM vs. BGLD - Dividend Comparison
PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF | 46.17% | 44.32% | 25.04% | 10.49% | 0.40% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTM and BGLD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTM has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to BGLD (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTM dropped -44.07% vs BGLD's -16.19%.
On 5-year performance, BGLD leads with 10.82% vs 8.97% for PLTM. On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BGLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BGLD has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for BGLD.
BGLD has the higher dividend yield at 46.17%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.
PLTM is categorized as Precious Metals, while BGLD is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PLTM and 0.91% for BGLD.
BGLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTM and BGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer