PortfoliosLab logo
BGLD vs. LQDH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BGLD and LQDH is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BGLD vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BGLD:

2.92

LQDH:

1.18

Sortino Ratio

BGLD:

3.81

LQDH:

1.74

Omega Ratio

BGLD:

1.54

LQDH:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

BGLD:

6.06

LQDH:

1.01

Martin Ratio

BGLD:

25.56

LQDH:

5.00

Ulcer Index

BGLD:

1.23%

LQDH:

0.98%

Daily Std Dev

BGLD:

10.84%

LQDH:

4.09%

Max Drawdown

BGLD:

-16.19%

LQDH:

-24.63%

Current Drawdown

BGLD:

-0.42%

LQDH:

-0.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGLD achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than LQDH's 1.33% return.


BGLD

YTD

16.21%

1M

0.47%

6M

15.51%

1Y

31.42%

3Y*

16.90%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

LQDH

YTD

1.33%

1M

2.03%

6M

1.48%

1Y

4.80%

3Y*

6.90%

5Y*

5.69%

10Y*

3.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BGLD vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BGLD vs. LQDH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BGLD is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BGLD is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BGLD is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BGLD is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BGLD is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BGLD is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDH is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDH is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDH is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDH is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDH is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDH is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BGLD vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BGLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the LQDH Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGLD and LQDH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BGLD vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison

BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.55%, more than LQDH's 6.95% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BGLD
FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
21.55%25.04%10.49%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LQDH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
6.95%7.57%7.69%3.73%1.64%2.22%3.09%5.08%2.37%2.33%2.98%2.19%

Drawdowns

BGLD vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGLD drawdown since its inception was -16.19%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLD and LQDH.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BGLD vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) has a higher volatility of 1.87% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) at 0.91%. This indicates that BGLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...