PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PLTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PLTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTE.TO achieves a -20.02% return, which is significantly lower than HUTL.TO's 10.98% return.


PLTE.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
2.64%
YTD
-20.02%
6M
-20.70%
1Y
74.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HUTL.TO

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
10.98%
6M
12.13%
1Y
18.32%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PLTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HUTL.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PLTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTE.TO
PLTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PLTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

HUTL.TO
HUTL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTE.TOHUTL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

1.35

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

1.86

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.62

-0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.33

11.27

-6.93

PLTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTE.TO and HUTL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTE.TOHUTL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.35

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.51

+0.68

Correlation

The correlation between PLTE.TO and HUTL.TO is -0.13. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

PLTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Dividend Comparison

PLTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.27%, more than HUTL.TO's 7.42% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
PLTE.TO
Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF
38.27%23.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUTL.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF
7.42%7.94%8.30%8.56%8.13%7.16%7.73%5.33%

Drawdowns

PLTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.92%, which is greater than HUTL.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTE.TO and HUTL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTE.TOHUTL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.92%

-34.00%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.32%

-7.17%

-34.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.91%

-1.37%

-29.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.85%

-6.80%

-8.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.72%

1.68%

+15.04%

Volatility

PLTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.08% compared to Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) at 3.50%. This indicates that PLTE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUTL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PLTE.TOHUTL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.08%

3.50%

+11.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.13%

6.72%

+34.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.94%

13.63%

+49.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.58%

12.83%

+57.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.58%

15.28%

+55.30%