HUTL.TO vs. FTS
Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and Fortis Inc (FTS).
HUTL.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jan 10, 2019.
Performance
HUTL.TO vs. FTS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HUTL.TO vs. FTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF | 11.42% | 15.59% | 14.70% | 3.11% | -4.97% | 16.04% | -10.64% | 13.96% |
FTS Fortis Inc | 9.77% | 23.67% | 14.90% | 5.01% | -7.54% | 21.62% | 0.19% | 20.69% |
Different Trading Currencies
HUTL.TO is traded in CAD, while FTS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FTS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUTL.TO achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly higher than FTS's 9.77% return.
HUTL.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- —
FTS
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 22.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUTL.TO vs. FTS — Risk / Return Rank
HUTL.TO
FTS
HUTL.TO vs. FTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and Fortis Inc (FTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUTL.TO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.43 | 1.67 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 2.39 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 3.84 | -1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 8.00 | +3.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUTL.TO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 1.67 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.82 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.68 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between HUTL.TO and FTS is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HUTL.TO vs. FTS - Dividend Comparison
HUTL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, more than FTS's 3.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF | 7.34% | 7.94% | 8.30% | 8.56% | 8.13% | 7.16% | 7.73% | 5.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTS Fortis Inc | 3.25% | 3.42% | 4.62% | 4.50% | 4.48% | 3.40% | 3.54% | 3.31% | 3.35% | 4.43% | 4.94% |
Drawdowns
HUTL.TO vs. FTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUTL.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, which is greater than FTS's maximum drawdown of -28.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTL.TO and FTS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUTL.TO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.00% | -34.36% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -6.63% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.71% | -29.96% | +10.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -4.73% | +3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.80% | -6.90% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 2.57% | -0.90% |
Volatility
HUTL.TO vs. FTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) is 3.63%, while Fortis Inc (FTS) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that HUTL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HUTL.TO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 4.39% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.70% | 9.55% | -2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 13.65% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.83% | 14.39% | -1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 16.96% | -1.67% |