PLTE.TO vs. PLTY
PLTE.TO (Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and PLTY (YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTE.TO returned 10.84% vs 6.03% for PLTY. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PLTE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTY.
Performance
PLTE.TO vs. PLTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PLTE.TO is traded in CAD, while PLTY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PLTY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTE.TO achieves a -21.07% return, which is significantly lower than PLTY's -12.44% return.
PLTE.TO
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -21.07%
- 6M
- -20.59%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTY
- 1D
- -5.15%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- -12.44%
- 6M
- -14.58%
- 1Y
- 6.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTE.TO vs. PLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | -21.07% | 159.97% |
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -12.44% | 83.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTE.TO and PLTY is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025 | 0.96 |
The correlation between PLTE.TO and PLTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTE.TO vs. PLTY — Risk / Return Rank
PLTE.TO
PLTY
PLTE.TO vs. PLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) and YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTE.TO | PLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.06 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 0.17 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | 0.32 | +0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTE.TO | PLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 0.14 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 1.31 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
PLTE.TO vs. PLTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.92%, which is greater than PLTY's maximum drawdown of -36.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTE.TO and PLTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTE.TO | PLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.92% | -36.47% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.32% | -36.24% | -5.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.82% | -25.87% | -5.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -13.40% | -3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.78% | 18.80% | +2.98% |
Volatility
PLTE.TO vs. PLTY - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.90% compared to YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) at 14.83%. This indicates that PLTE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTE.TO | PLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.90% | 14.83% | +4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.12% | 31.65% | +10.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.11% | 42.84% | +13.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.55% | 52.20% | +17.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.55% | 52.20% | +17.35% |
PLTE.TO vs. PLTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTE.TO vs. PLTY - Dividend Comparison
PLTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.53%, less than PLTY's 108.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 40.53% | 23.70% | 0.00% |
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 108.80% | 112.44% | 7.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, PLTE.TO and PLTY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PLTE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTY.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PLTE.TO and 0.99% for PLTY.
Find the right allocation for PLTE.TO and PLTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer