PLTE.TO vs. PLTW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW).

PLTE.TO and PLTW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PLTE.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jan 16, 2025. PLTW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025.

Performance

PLTE.TO vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PLTE.TO vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	-22.82%	57.03%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-21.31%	53.76%

Different Trading Currencies

PLTE.TO is traded in CAD, while PLTW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PLTW values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTE.TO achieves a -22.82% return, which is significantly lower than PLTW's -21.31% return.

PLTE.TO

• 1D: 3.41%
• 1M: 5.17%
• YTD: -22.82%
• 6M: -22.26%
• 1Y: 66.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTW

• 1D: 7.57%
• 1M: 9.04%
• YTD: -21.31%
• 6M: -26.90%
• 1Y: 69.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTE.TO vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.

PLTW

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF

PLTE.TO

Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF

Return for Risk

PLTE.TO vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTE.TO

PLTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 60
PLTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
PLTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
PLTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PLTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
PLTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 43

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 61
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 65
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTE.TO vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLTE.TO	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	1.03	+0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	1.65	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.22	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	1.33	+0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.93	3.14	+0.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLTE.TO vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTE.TO and PLTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLTE.TO	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	1.03	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	0.26	+0.86

Correlation

The correlation between PLTE.TO and PLTW is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PLTE.TO vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

PLTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.10%, less than PLTW's 114.73% yield.

	TTM	2025
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	35.10%	23.70%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	114.73%	72.40%

Drawdowns

PLTE.TO vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.92%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -46.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTE.TO and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTE.TO	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.92%	-45.33%	+1.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.32%	-45.33%	+4.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.33%	-36.49%	+3.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.81%	-16.36%	+1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.62%	19.06%	-2.44%

Volatility

PLTE.TO vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) is 13.86%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 17.84%. This indicates that PLTE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTE.TO	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.86%	17.84%	-3.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.75%	44.43%	-3.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.67%	68.60%	-5.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.49%	72.34%	-1.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.49%	72.34%	-1.85%