PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUMN vs. NOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUMN vs. NOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) and Nokia Corporation (NOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUMN achieves a 27.41% return, which is significantly lower than NOK's 159.40% return. Over the past 10 years, LUMN has underperformed NOK with an annualized return of -4.16%, while NOK has yielded a comparatively higher 14.37% annualized return.


LUMN

1D
-0.80%
1M
7.26%
YTD
27.41%
6M
12.76%
1Y
153.20%
3Y*
73.06%
5Y*
-5.67%
10Y*
-4.16%

NOK

1D
-0.66%
1M
23.85%
YTD
159.40%
6M
172.45%
1Y
215.38%
3Y*
65.50%
5Y*
27.94%
10Y*
14.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUMN vs. NOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
27.41%46.33%190.16%-64.94%-55.48%38.82%-19.18%-5.22%2.00%-21.73%
NOK
Nokia Corporation
159.40%50.85%34.33%-23.97%-24.44%59.08%5.39%-34.91%30.04%-0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between LUMN and NOK is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1994

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUMN:

$9.89B

NOK:

$95.11B

EPS

LUMN:

-$1.75

NOK:

$0.14

PS Ratio

LUMN:

0.81

NOK:

4.61

PB Ratio

LUMN:

0.85

NOK:

4.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUMN:

$12.12B

NOK:

$20.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUMN:

$1.52B

NOK:

$8.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

LUMN:

$1.12B

NOK:

$2.24B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUMN vs. NOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUMN
LUMN Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LUMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUMN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
LUMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUMN Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NOK
NOK Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOK Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOK Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUMN vs. NOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) and Nokia Corporation (NOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUMNNOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.63

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

8.82

-5.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

17.24

-10.98

LUMN vs. NOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUMN Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the NOK Sharpe Ratio of 4.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUMN and NOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUMNNOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

4.26

-2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.77

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

0.36

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.20

-0.01

Drawdowns

LUMN vs. NOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUMN drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, roughly equal to the maximum NOK drawdown of -95.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUMN and NOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUMNNOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.26%

-95.99%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.34%

-24.59%

-22.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.66%

-29.74%

-39.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.86%

-50.56%

-42.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.44%

-62.56%

-31.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.10%

-43.96%

-8.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.64%

-64.87%

+37.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.60%

12.55%

+12.05%

Volatility

LUMN vs. NOK - Volatility Comparison

Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) has a higher volatility of 25.94% compared to Nokia Corporation (NOK) at 23.89%. This indicates that LUMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUMNNOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.94%

23.89%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.92%

37.38%

+19.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.74%

50.85%

+28.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.17%

36.43%

+48.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.50%

40.20%

+27.30%

Dividends

LUMN vs. NOK - Dividend Comparison

LUMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.37%7.97%10.26%7.57%14.26%12.95%9.08%8.59%
NOK
Nokia Corporation
0.99%2.45%3.17%3.51%1.32%0.00%0.00%3.01%4.06%4.07%6.02%2.22%

Financials

LUMN vs. NOK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lumen Technologies, Inc. and Nokia Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
2.90B
4.50B
(LUMN) Total Revenue
(NOK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LUMN vs. NOK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lumen Technologies, Inc. and Nokia Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
44.2%
Portfolio components
LUMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NOK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nokia Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.99B and revenue of 4.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.

LUMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 602.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.

NOK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nokia Corporation reported an operating income of 63.00M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.4%.

LUMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -200.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in a net margin of -6.9%.

NOK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nokia Corporation reported a net income of 86.00M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LUMN and NOK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUMN has higher volatility (25.94%) compared to NOK (23.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUMN dropped -95.26% vs NOK's -95.99%.

NOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUMN and NOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer