LUMN vs. KMI
LUMN (Lumen Technologies, Inc.) and KMI (Kinder Morgan, Inc.) are both stocks. LUMN operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while KMI operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, LUMN returned -9.37%/yr vs 10.37%/yr for KMI. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LUMN vs. KMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUMN achieves a -17.89% return, which is significantly lower than KMI's 19.29% return. Over the past 10 years, LUMN has underperformed KMI with an annualized return of -9.37%, while KMI has yielded a comparatively higher 10.37% annualized return.
LUMN
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- 6M
- -27.66%
- YTD
- -17.89%
- 1Y
- 71.97%
- 3Y*
- 46.48%
- 5Y*
- -10.65%
- 10Y*
- -9.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.43%
KMI
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 18.01%
- 3Y*
- 28.06%
- 5Y*
- 19.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $379.13M | $306.76M | $325.97M | |
| $70.00M | $71.60M | $116.26M |
LUMN vs. KMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | -17.89% | 46.33% | 190.16% | -64.94% | -55.48% | 38.82% | -19.18% | -5.22% | 2.00% | -21.73% |
KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 19.29% | 4.74% | 64.42% | 4.10% | 21.23% | 23.75% | -30.77% | 44.43% | -11.18% | -10.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUMN and KMI is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2011 | 0.28 |
The correlation between LUMN and KMI shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LUMN:
$6.57B
KMI:
$71.66B
LUMN:
-$1.74
KMI:
$0.95
LUMN:
0.52
KMI:
4.53
LUMN:
$12.12B
KMI:
$11.85B
LUMN:
$1.52B
KMI:
$5.16B
LUMN:
$1.12B
KMI:
$5.61B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUMN vs. KMI — Risk / Return Rank
LUMN
KMI
LUMN vs. KMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) and Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LUMN | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 1.81 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.51 | 3.83 | -2.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LUMN vs. KMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUMN drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than KMI's maximum drawdown of -72.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUMN and KMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUMN | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.26% | -72.70% | -22.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.68% | -10.08% | -37.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.66% | -18.40% | -51.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.51% | -20.31% | -72.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.44% | -55.13% | -39.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.13% | -6.21% | -62.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.79% | -31.84% | +4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.96% | 4.76% | +24.20% |
Volatility
LUMN vs. KMI - Volatility Comparison
Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) has a higher volatility of 15.66% compared to Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) at 5.69%. This indicates that LUMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUMN | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.66% | 5.69% | +9.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.04% | 14.36% | +41.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.06% | 20.15% | +60.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.67% | 22.41% | +63.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.82% | 27.45% | +40.37% |
Dividends
LUMN vs. KMI - Dividend Comparison
LUMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 2.74% | 4.24% | 4.18% | 6.38% | 6.10% | 6.76% | 7.59% | 4.49% | 4.71% | 2.77% | 2.41% | 12.94% |
LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.37% | 7.97% | 10.26% | 7.57% | 14.26% | 12.95% | 9.08% | 8.59% |
Financials
LUMN vs. KMI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lumen Technologies, Inc. and Kinder Morgan, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LUMN vs. KMI - Profitability Comparison
LUMN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported a gross profit of -1.63B and revenue of -1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
LUMN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 602.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.
KMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.44B and revenue of -1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 88.7%.
LUMN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -200.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in a net margin of -6.9%.
KMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported a net income of -1.01B and revenue of -1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 62.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LUMN and KMI have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LUMN has higher volatility (15.66%) compared to KMI (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUMN dropped -95.26% vs KMI's -72.70%.
KMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LUMN and KMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer