PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUBN vs. PGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AUBN vs. PGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUBN achieves a -2.59% return, which is significantly higher than PGR's -9.60% return. Over the past 10 years, AUBN has underperformed PGR with an annualized return of 2.10%, while PGR has yielded a comparatively higher 22.74% annualized return.


AUBN

1D
1.80%
1M
10.00%
YTD
-2.59%
6M
5.77%
1Y
31.70%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
-3.25%
10Y*
2.10%

PGR

1D
-1.71%
1M
-2.90%
YTD
-9.60%
6M
-9.39%
1Y
-28.28%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
16.61%
10Y*
22.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUBN vs. PGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AUBN
Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc.
-2.59%20.17%16.32%-2.81%-25.99%-20.35%-19.63%71.98%-16.65%27.56%
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
-9.60%-3.02%51.39%23.16%26.81%10.84%41.48%25.14%9.39%61.59%

Correlation

The correlation between AUBN and PGR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 1995

0.02

The correlation between AUBN and PGR shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.02 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AUBN:

$2.27

PGR:

$19.23

PE Ratio

AUBN:

11.45

PGR:

10.06

PEG Ratio

AUBN:

0.15

PGR:

0.08

PS Ratio

AUBN:

2.31

PGR:

1.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

AUBN:

$39.23M

PGR:

$87.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AUBN:

$33.06M

PGR:

$23.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

AUBN:

$10.60M

PGR:

$14.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUBN vs. PGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUBN
AUBN Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AUBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUBN Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
AUBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUBN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PGR
PGR Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGR Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGR Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUBN vs. PGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUBNPGRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.73

-1.28

+2.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.23

-1.78

+3.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.80

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

-1.01

+2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.05

-1.46

+4.51

AUBN vs. PGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUBN Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the PGR Sharpe Ratio of -1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUBN and PGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUBNPGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

-1.28

+2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.68

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

0.93

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.58

-0.47

Drawdowns

AUBN vs. PGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUBN drawdown since its inception was -83.53%, which is greater than PGR's maximum drawdown of -71.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUBN and PGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUBNPGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.53%

-71.06%

-12.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.48%

-28.14%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.48%

-30.35%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.08%

-30.35%

-19.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.42%

-30.35%

-39.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.07%

-29.23%

-18.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.14%

-14.53%

-29.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.43%

20.72%

-10.29%

Volatility

AUBN vs. PGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN) is 5.35%, while The Progressive Corporation (PGR) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that AUBN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUBNPGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

5.82%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.10%

16.25%

+14.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.56%

22.23%

+21.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.72%

24.52%

+8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.70%

24.43%

+14.27%

Dividends

AUBN vs. PGR - Dividend Comparison

AUBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than PGR's 7.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUBN
Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc.
4.16%4.01%4.60%5.08%4.61%3.22%2.45%1.89%3.03%2.37%2.87%2.97%
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
7.18%2.15%0.48%0.25%0.31%6.23%2.68%3.89%1.86%1.21%2.50%2.16%

Financials

AUBN vs. PGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. and The Progressive Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
8.63M
22.74B
(AUBN) Total Revenue
(PGR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AUBN and PGR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGR has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to AUBN (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUBN dropped -83.53% vs PGR's -71.06%.

AUBN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUBN and PGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer