PLMR vs. XPEV
PLMR (Palomar Holdings, Inc.) and XPEV (XPeng Inc.) are both stocks. PLMR operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while XPEV operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, PLMR returned 8.52%/yr vs -18.98%/yr for XPEV. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLMR vs. XPEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLMR achieves a -14.77% return, which is significantly higher than XPEV's -28.55% return.
PLMR
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- -14.77%
- 6M
- -9.27%
- 1Y
- -28.63%
- 3Y*
- 25.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
XPEV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -7.23%
- YTD
- -28.55%
- 6M
- -23.70%
- 1Y
- -20.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- -18.98%
- 10Y*
- —
PLMR vs. XPEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLMR Palomar Holdings, Inc. | -14.77% | 27.63% | 90.25% | 22.90% | -30.28% | -27.09% | -16.52% |
XPEV XPeng Inc. | -28.55% | 71.57% | -18.99% | 46.78% | -80.25% | 17.51% | 85.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLMR and XPEV is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2020 | 0.13 |
The correlation between PLMR and XPEV shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PLMR:
$3.14B
XPEV:
$6.92B
PLMR:
$7.18
XPEV:
-CN¥3.15
PLMR:
3.22
XPEV:
0.95
PLMR:
3.27
XPEV:
1.65
PLMR:
$977.99M
XPEV:
CN¥73.56B
PLMR:
$401.29M
XPEV:
CN¥14.61B
PLMR:
$210.26M
XPEV:
-CN¥3.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLMR vs. XPEV — Risk / Return Rank
PLMR
XPEV
PLMR vs. XPEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) and XPeng Inc. (XPEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLMR | XPEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.96 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | -0.51 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | -0.89 | -0.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLMR vs. XPEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLMR drawdown since its inception was -62.86%, smaller than the maximum XPEV drawdown of -91.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLMR and XPEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLMR | XPEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.86% | -91.12% | +28.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.51% | -48.49% | +10.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.27% | -71.65% | +29.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.81% | -88.35% | +34.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.62% | -79.92% | +45.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.81% | -67.89% | +39.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.17% | 27.68% | -3.51% |
Volatility
PLMR vs. XPEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) is 11.03%, while XPeng Inc. (XPEV) has a volatility of 14.02%. This indicates that PLMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLMR | XPEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.03% | 14.02% | -2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.78% | 35.62% | -11.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.57% | 55.48% | -18.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.68% | 78.68% | -36.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.88% | 83.39% | -35.51% |
Dividends
PLMR vs. XPEV - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLMR nor XPEV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PLMR vs. XPEV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palomar Holdings, Inc. and XPeng Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PLMR vs. XPEV - Profitability Comparison
PLMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 278.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
XPEV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPeng Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.67B and revenue of 12.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.6%.
PLMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 278.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
XPEV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPeng Inc. reported an operating income of -2.10B and revenue of 12.95B, resulting in an operating margin of -16.2%.
PLMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 42.95M and revenue of 278.94M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
XPEV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPeng Inc. reported a net income of -1.77B and revenue of 12.95B, resulting in a net margin of -13.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLMR and XPEV have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XPEV has higher volatility (14.02%) compared to PLMR (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLMR dropped -62.86% vs XPEV's -91.12%.
XPEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLMR and XPEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer