PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPEV vs. LI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XPEV vs. LI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in XPeng Inc. (XPEV) and Li Auto Inc. (LI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPEV achieves a -34.17% return, which is significantly lower than LI's -24.28% return.


XPEV

1D
1.06%
1M
-14.37%
YTD
-34.17%
6M
-33.32%
1Y
-27.09%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
-20.34%
10Y*

LI

1D
-2.95%
1M
-19.32%
YTD
-24.28%
6M
-24.50%
1Y
-50.71%
3Y*
-27.19%
5Y*
-16.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPEV vs. LI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XPEV
XPeng Inc.
-34.17%71.57%-18.99%46.78%-80.25%17.51%85.41%
LI
Li Auto Inc.
-24.28%-29.43%-35.91%83.48%-36.45%11.34%23.31%

Correlation

The correlation between XPEV and LI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2020

0.70

The correlation between XPEV and LI shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XPEV:

$6.38B

LI:

$13.00B

EPS

XPEV:

-CN¥3.15

LI:

-CN¥1.74

PS Ratio

XPEV:

0.88

LI:

0.82

PB Ratio

XPEV:

1.52

LI:

1.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

XPEV:

CN¥73.56B

LI:

CN¥108.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XPEV:

CN¥14.61B

LI:

CN¥17.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

XPEV:

-CN¥3.76B

LI:

-CN¥2.83B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPEV vs. LI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPEV
XPEV Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XPEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPEV Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
XPEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPEV Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

LI
LI Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
LI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
LI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
LI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPEV vs. LI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XPeng Inc. (XPEV) and Li Auto Inc. (LI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XPEVLIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.77

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

-0.85

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.95

-1.33

+0.38

XPEV vs. LI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPEV Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is higher than the LI Sharpe Ratio of -1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPEV and LI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XPEV vs. LI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPEV drawdown since its inception was -91.12%, which is greater than LI's maximum drawdown of -72.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPEV and LI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPEVLIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.12%

-72.52%

-18.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.94%

-59.69%

+6.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.65%

-72.52%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.35%

-72.52%

-15.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.50%

-72.52%

-8.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.94%

-40.04%

-27.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.61%

38.25%

-9.64%

Volatility

XPEV vs. LI - Volatility Comparison

XPeng Inc. (XPEV) has a higher volatility of 13.96% compared to Li Auto Inc. (LI) at 11.78%. This indicates that XPEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPEVLIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.96%

11.78%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.74%

29.04%

+6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.21%

40.21%

+15.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.54%

63.47%

+15.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.28%

68.25%

+15.03%

Dividends

XPEV vs. LI - Dividend Comparison

Neither XPEV nor LI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

XPEV vs. LI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between XPeng Inc. and Li Auto Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
12.95B
22.84B
(XPEV) Total Revenue
(LI) Total Revenue
Values in CNY except per share items

XPEV vs. LI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between XPeng Inc. and Li Auto Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%20222023202420252026
20.6%
7.9%
Portfolio components
XPEV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPeng Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.67B and revenue of 12.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.6%.

LI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 22.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.

XPEV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPeng Inc. reported an operating income of -2.10B and revenue of 12.95B, resulting in an operating margin of -16.2%.

LI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported an operating income of -2.95B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.

XPEV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPeng Inc. reported a net income of -1.77B and revenue of 12.95B, resulting in a net margin of -13.7%.

LI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a net income of -2.28B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in a net margin of -10.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XPEV and LI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XPEV has higher volatility (13.96%) compared to LI (11.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPEV dropped -91.12% vs LI's -72.52%.

XPEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.49 vs -1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPEV and LI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer